IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aaeach/348176.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Agricultural Water Conservation Can Save the Great Salt Lake

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Man
  • Khan, Asif Ahmed

Abstract

Water is essential for meeting basic human needs and sustaining healthy ecosystems. The demand for water is rising due to rapid population growth, urbanization, and increasing use in agriculture, industry, and energy sectors. Even with advancements in water-use efficiency, water stress and scarcity remain critical issues worldwide, including in Utah. This article highlights a recent study assessing the economic feasibility of protecting Utah’s shrinking Great Salt Lake (GSL) by incentivizing agricultural water conservation. The study demonstrates that an annual water conservation goal of 471 thousand acre-feet (KAF) can be met by fallowing irrigated alfalfa fields, with unit water-saving costs ranging between $688 and $806 per acre-foot (AF) (Li and Khan, 2024a). These costs are comparable to the lowest-tier residential water rates in many Utah cities. This research could support agricultural water conservation decisions, and the methodology is transferable to other regions seeking to preserve land-based natural resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Man & Khan, Asif Ahmed, 2024. "How Agricultural Water Conservation Can Save the Great Salt Lake," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 39(4), November.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaeach:348176
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.348176
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/348176/files/How%20Agricultural%20Water%20Conservation%20Can%20Save%20the%20Great%20Salt%20Lake.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.348176?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaeach:348176. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.