IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/agr/journl/vxxxiy2024i2(639)p5-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Performance and risk – a changing and complex relationship for banking business

Author

Listed:
  • Dan Costin NIȚESCU

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Adina Elena CĂLIN

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

  • Eugen-Marian VIERESCU

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania)

Abstract

The paper aims to analyse the evolution of the European banking sector between two global crises. It focuses on the factors that triggered the banking transformation after 2008 and on the interrelationship between business activity and risk related indicators. The research also considers the development of the banking sector and the necessity to be permanently equipped with the proper mitigation strategies for a constantly changing risk landscape. We selected the most important European banks that, during the entire analysed period, maintained their leading positions through increased financial performance and efficient risk management. The results of the study indicate that the profitability of European banks registered a mixed evolution, depending on the indicator considered for the analysis. In terms of risk, the strategic analysis of the Basel framework indicates a link between the state of the banking sector and the prudential framework when comparing the global financial crisis with the crisis generated by the Covid-19 pandemic. To enrich the research, we considered top 10 banking organisations from Western Europe and top 10 from Central and Eastern Europe. The results of the comparative analysis between West and East indicate structural differences that emerge as a result of different ways of doing banking business. Profitability and risk maintain their key importance, as the risk landscape evolved at the same pace with the banking activity. Besides the traditional financial risks, other factors of risk have reached an importance level which question the capacity of the risk management function at the level of banking organisations to keep up in a volatile, dynamic and complex environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Dan Costin NIȚESCU & Adina Elena CĂLIN & Eugen-Marian VIERESCU, 2024. "Performance and risk – a changing and complex relationship for banking business," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(2(639), S), pages 5-24, Summer.
  • Handle: RePEc:agr:journl:v:xxxi:y:2024:i:2(639):p:5-24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://store.ectap.ro/articole/1740.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ectap.ro/articol.php?id=1740&rid=155
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Repullo, Rafael, 2004. "Capital requirements, market power, and risk-taking in banking," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 156-182, April.
    2. Anginer,Deniz & Demirguc-Kunt,Asli & Mare,Davide Salvatore, 2020. "Bank Capital and Risk in Europe and Central Asia Ten Years After the Crisis," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9138, The World Bank.
    3. Martin Čihák & Heiko Hesse, 2010. "Islamic Banks and Financial Stability: An Empirical Analysis," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 38(2), pages 95-113, December.
    4. Doga Izcan & Eralp Bektas, 2022. "The Relationship between ESG Scores and Firm-Specific Risk of Eurozone Banks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    5. Stefan Kerbl & Michael Sigmund, 2016. "From low to negative rates: an asymmetric dilemma," Financial Stability Report, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue 32, pages 120-137.
    6. Coval, Joshua D. & Thakor, Anjan V., 2005. "Financial intermediation as a beliefs-bridge between optimists and pessimists," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(3), pages 535-569, March.
    7. Phil Molyneux & Alessio Reghezza & John Thornton & Ru Xie, 2020. "Did Negative Interest Rates Improve Bank Lending?," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 57(1), pages 51-68, February.
    8. Barth, James R. & Lin, Chen & Ma, Yue & Seade, Jesús & Song, Frank M., 2013. "Do bank regulation, supervision and monitoring enhance or impede bank efficiency?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(8), pages 2879-2892.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Ting-Hsuan & Shen, Chung-Hua & Wu, Meng-Wen & Huang, Kuo-Jui, 2021. "Effect of shadow banking on the relation between capital and liquidity creation," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 166-184.
    2. González, Luis Otero & Razia, Alaa & Búa, Milagros Vivel & Sestayo, Rubén Lado, 2017. "Competition, concentration and risk taking in Banking sector of MENA countries," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 591-604.
    3. Risfandy, Tastaftiyan & Tarazi, Amine & Trinugroho, Irwan, 2022. "Competition in dual markets: Implications for banking system stability," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    4. Doumpos, Michael & Hasan, Iftekhar & Pasiouras, Fotios, 2017. "Bank overall financial strength: Islamic versus conventional banks," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 513-523.
    5. Berger, Allen N. & Sedunov, John, 2017. "Bank liquidity creation and real economic output," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1-19.
    6. Avignone, Giuseppe & Girardone, Claudia & Pancaro, Cosimo & Pancotto, Livia & Reghezza, Alessio, 2022. "Making a virtue out of necessity: the effect of negative interest rates on bank cost efficiency," Working Paper Series 2718, European Central Bank.
    7. Ahmad Sahyouni & Man Wang, 2022. "Bank capital and liquidity creation: evidence from Islamic and conventional MENA banks," Afro-Asian Journal of Finance and Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(3), pages 291-311.
    8. Brei, Michael & Jacolin, Luc & Noah, Alphonse, 2020. "Credit risk and bank competition in Sub-Saharan Africa," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    9. Saibal Ghosh, 2016. "Capital Buffer, Credit Risk and Liquidity Behaviour: Evidence for GCC Banks," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 58(4), pages 539-569, December.
    10. Zuzana Fungáčová & Laurent Weill & Mingming Zhou, 2017. "Bank Capital, Liquidity Creation and Deposit Insurance," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 51(1), pages 97-123, February.
    11. Mohamed Albaity & Ray Saadaoui Mallek & Hussein A. Hassan Al‐Tamimi & Abu Hanifa Md. Noman, 2021. "Does competition lead to financial stability or financial fragility for Islamic and conventional banks? Evidence from the GCC countries," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(3), pages 4706-4722, July.
    12. Anginer, Deniz & Demirguc-Kunt, Asli, 2014. "Bank capital and systemic stability," Policy Research Working Paper Series 6948, The World Bank.
    13. Xiaoqing (Maggie) Fu & Yongjia (Rebecca) Lin & Philip Molyneux, 2016. "Bank Capital And Liquidity Creation In Asia Pacific," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 54(2), pages 966-993, April.
    14. Sviatlana Hlebik, 2017. "Liquidity Risk under The New Basel Global Regulatory Framework," Applied Economics and Finance, Redfame publishing, vol. 4(6), pages 78-90, November.
    15. Kabir, Md. Nurul & Worthington, Andrew C., 2017. "The ‘competition–stability/fragility’ nexus: A comparative analysis of Islamic and conventional banks," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 111-128.
    16. Mohammad Bitar & M. Kabir Hassan & William J. Hippler, 2017. "Determinants of Bank Capital in Dual Banking Systems," NFI Working Papers 2017-WP-04, Indiana State University, Scott College of Business, Networks Financial Institute.
    17. Bitar, Mohammad & Pukthuanthong, Kuntara & Walker, Thomas, 2020. "Efficiency in Islamic vs. conventional banking: The role of capital and liquidity," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    18. Chen Zheng & Adrian (Wai Kong) Cheung & Tom Cronje, 2022. "The Impact of TARP Capital Infusion on Bank Liquidity Creation: Does Bank Size Matter?," International Journal of Central Banking, International Journal of Central Banking, vol. 18(2), pages 283-347, June.
    19. repec:zbw:bofitp:2010_017 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Diallo, Boubacar & Al-Mansour, Abdullah, 2017. "Shadow banking, insurance and financial sector stability," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 224-232.
    21. Bitar, Mohammad & Kabir Hassan, M. & Hippler, William J., 2018. "The determinants of Islamic bank capital decisions," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 48-68.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:agr:journl:v:xxxi:y:2024:i:2(639):p:5-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mircea Dinu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/agerrea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.