IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/agr/journl/vxxiiiy2016i1(606)p247-254.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study regarding the influence of the endogenous and exogenous factors on credit institution’s return on assets

Author

Listed:
  • Maria-Daciana RODEAN (COZMA)

    (“Lucian Blaga” University, Sibiu, Romania)

  • Nicolae BALTEŞ

    (“Lucian Blaga” University, Sibiu, Romania)

Abstract

The goal of each credit institution is represented by profitability, an objective hardly to be achieved, taking into account that banks are practicing their usual activities within a banking system that hardly tries to recover. The main purpose of this research is to identify the existence of a dependency relationship between return on assets and endogenous factors (growth rate of the loan portfolios; the rate of growth of the provisions and solvency ratio) and the exogenous ones (GDP and inflation rate). The analysis done over the horizon of the last 10 years, a period that includes both economic boom, recession and recovery, illustrated the vulnerability of the credit institution in front of the business environment. The study demonstrated a significant dependence relationship, between return on assets recorded by Carpatica Commercial Bank and the intern determinants, while the variation of the exogenous factors does not explain the variation of ROA recorded by the bank.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria-Daciana RODEAN (COZMA) & Nicolae BALTEŞ, 2016. "Study regarding the influence of the endogenous and exogenous factors on credit institution’s return on assets," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(1(606), S), pages 247-254, Spring.
    • Handle: RePEc:agr:journl:v:xxiii:y:2016:i:1(606):p:247-254
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://store.ectap.ro/articole/1175.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ectap.ro/articol.php?id=1175&rid=122
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Laeven, Luc & Majnoni, Giovanni, 2003. "Loan loss provisioning and economic slowdowns: too much, too late?," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 178-197, April.
    2. Athanasoglou, Panayiotis P. & Brissimis, Sophocles N. & Delis, Matthaios D., 2008. "Bank-specific, industry-specific and macroeconomic determinants of bank profitability," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 121-136, April.
    3. Mr. Daniel C Hardy & Mr. Christian Schmieder, 2013. "Rules of Thumb for Bank Solvency Stress Testing," IMF Working Papers 2013/232, International Monetary Fund.
    4. Pasiouras, Fotios & Kosmidou, Kyriaki, 2007. "Factors influencing the profitability of domestic and foreign commercial banks in the European Union," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 222-237, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nicolae BALTES & Maria-Daciana RODEAN, 2017. "Efficiency of Operational Activity of Commercial Banks in Romania," Expert Journal of Finance, Sprint Investify, vol. 5(1), pages 86-93.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peterson K. Ozili, 2018. "Banking stability determinants in Africa," International Journal of Managerial Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(4), pages 462-483, May.
    2. Peterson K. Ozili, 2018. "Banking stability determinants in Africa," International Journal of Managerial Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 14(4), pages 462-483, May.
    3. Malgorzata Anna Olszak & Patrycja Chodnicka, 2014. "Do institutional and political factors matter for the efficiency of banking sectors?," Journal of Banking and Financial Economics, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management, vol. 1(1), pages 40-58, May.
    4. Claudiu Mihail MANOLESCU & Elena MANOLESCU, 2016. "The influence of non-performing loans on macroeconomic indicators in Romania between 2009-2015," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(Special(I), pages 220-230.
    5. Nicolae BALTEȘ & Alexandra-Gabriela-Maria DRAGOE & Sebastian-Ilie DRAGOE, 2016. "The evaluation of the companies financial performance through the rates of return," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(Special(I), pages 84-95.
    6. Benjamin M Tabak & Dimas M Fazio & Regis A Ely & Joao M. T. Amaral & Daniel O Cajueiro, 2017. "The effects of capital buffers on profitability: An empirical study," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 37(3), pages 1468-1473.
    7. Chau H. A. Le, 2016. "Macro-financial linkages and bank behaviour: evidence from the second-round effects of the global financial crisis on East Asia," Eurasian Economic Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 6(3), pages 365-387, December.
    8. Simone Rossi & Mariarosa Borroni & Andrea Lippi & Mariacristina Piva, 2018. "Determinants of Bank Profitability in the Euro Area: What Has Changed During the Recent Financial Crisis?," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(5), pages 18-27, May.
    9. Maria Elisabete Duarte Neves & Maria Do Castelo Gouveia & Catarina Alexandra Neves Proença, 2020. "European Bank’s Performance and Efficiency," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, April.
    10. Helmi Hamdi & Abdelaziz Hakimi & Khemais Zaghdoudi, 2017. "Diversification, bank performance and risk: have Tunisian banks adopted the new business model?," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 3(1), pages 1-25, December.
    11. Pejman Ebrahimi & Maria Fekete-Farkas & Parisa Bouzari & Róbert Magda, 2021. "Financial Performance of Iranian Banks from 2013 to 2019: A Panel Data Approach," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, June.
    12. Martins, António Miguel & Serra, Ana Paula & Stevenson, Simon, 2019. "Determinants of real estate bank profitability," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 282-300.
    13. Peterson K. Ozili, 2017. "Bank Profitability and Capital Regulation: Evidence from Listed and non-Listed Banks in Africa," Journal of African Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 143-168, April.
    14. Valentina Ioana MERA, 2016. "Issues on money demand and economic stability," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(Special(I), pages 205-211.
    15. Hamdi, Helmi & Hakimi, Abdelaziz, 2019. "Does Liquidity Matter on Bank Profitability? Evidence from a Nonlinear Framework for a Large Sample," Business and Economics Research Journal, Uludag University, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, vol. 10(1), pages 13-26, January.
    16. Saibal Ghosh, 2016. "Capital Buffer, Credit Risk and Liquidity Behaviour: Evidence for GCC Banks," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 58(4), pages 539-569, December.
    17. Costin A. ISTRATE, 2016. "Transfer pricing in the insurance market," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(Special(I), pages 35-46.
    18. Fazelina Sahul Hamid, 2017. "The Effect of Market Structure on Banks’ Profitability and Stability: Evidence from ASEAN-5 Countries," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(4), pages 578-598, October.
    19. Yanikkaya, Halit & Gumus, Nihat & Pabuccu, Yasar Ugur, 2018. "How profitability differs between conventional and Islamic banks: A dynamic panel data approach," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 99-111.
    20. Malgorzata A. Olszak & Mateusz Pipien, 2013. "Cross country linkages as determinants of procyclicality of loan loss provisions – empirical importance of SURE specification," Faculty of Management Working Paper Series 22013, University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:agr:journl:v:xxiii:y:2016:i:1(606):p:247-254. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mircea Dinu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/agerrea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.