IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/agr/journl/v3(544)y2010i3(544)p5-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Administrative Convergence in the Balkan Area. Empirical Analysis of Social Policy in Romania and Bulgaria

Author

Listed:
  • Ani MATEI

    (National School of Political Studies and Public Administration, Bucharest)

  • Tatiana-Camelia DOGARU

    (National School of Political Studies and Public Administration, Bucharest)

Abstract

In a world of permanent change and movement with interconnected actions that create interdependences, the institutions and administrative systems should be flexible and transparent to adapt theirselves to these changes and to create the necessary framework for developing in good conditions all the aspects of the social life. In this paper, the attention is focused on the administrative convergence, considering that it is impossible to conceive a strong European construction without the existence of an effective public administration at both levels, national and European, and therefore the research tries to emphasize few signs of convergence between Romanian and Bulgarian employment policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Ani MATEI & Tatiana-Camelia DOGARU, 2010. "The Administrative Convergence in the Balkan Area. Empirical Analysis of Social Policy in Romania and Bulgaria," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 3(3(544)), pages 5-24, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:agr:journl:v:3(544):y:2010:i:3(544):p:5-24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://store.ectap.ro/articole/448.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ectap.ro/articol.php?id=448&rid=59
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mihail Titu & Amelia Bucur, 2016. "Models for quality analysis of services in the local public administration," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 921-936, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:agr:journl:v:3(544):y:2010:i:3(544):p:5-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mircea Dinu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/agerrea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.