IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/agr/journl/v2(497)y2006i2(497)p35-40.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Credit Institutions Management Evaluation using Quantitative Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Nicolae Dardac
  • Bogdan Moinescu

    (Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest)

Abstract

Credit institutions supervising mission by state authorities is mostly assimilated with systemic risk prevention. In present, the mission is orientated on analyzing the risk profile of the credit institutions, the mechanism and existing systems as management tools providing to bank rules the proper instruments to avoid and control specific bank risks. Rating systems are sophisticated measurement instruments which are capable to assure the above objectives, such as success in banking risk management. The management quality is one of the most important elements from the set of variables used in the quoting process in credit operations. Evaluation of this quality is – generally speaking – fundamented on quantitative appreciations which can induce subjectivism and heterogeneity in quotation. The problem can be solved by using, complementary, quantitative technics such us DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis).

Suggested Citation

  • Nicolae Dardac & Bogdan Moinescu, 2006. "Credit Institutions Management Evaluation using Quantitative Methods," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 2(2(497)), pages 35-40, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:agr:journl:v:2(497):y:2006:i:2(497):p:35-40
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://store.ectap.ro/articole/35.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ectap.ro/articol.php?id=35&rid=2
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:agr:journl:v:2(497):y:2006:i:2(497):p:35-40. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mircea Dinu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/agerrea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.