IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/agr/journl/v1(496)y2006i1(496)p98-102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Economy versus Planned Economy. Current Approaches and Problems

Author

Listed:
  • Ani Matei

    (Scoala Nationala de Studii Politice si Administrative Bucuresti)

Abstract

The present paper proposes a review of the current object and problems facing the public economy. For the past decade and a half, public economy has clearly come back in the attention of the research interests of specialists from the Central and Eastern European countries. Among these, the scientific research encompassed by the public economy area interrelates with the international trends. At a closer look, public economy appears to be a science, particularly interdisciplinary, with sociological, political, econometrical or systemic approaches possible to prevail. To continue, the author makes reference to four pillars of the public economy: optimum, welfare, social choice and economic justice that allow different approaches to develop. A science branch, equally theoretical and practical, public economy will stress its connections with the economic and mathematic modeling, systemic analysis or sociological and political research. Still, seve¬ral problems in public economy remain open. These concentrate on the public interest, intervention and decision. Conceptualization, understanding and description of the mechanisms that allow the operationalisation may form the basis for further developments on both theoretical and practical level. A clear distinction in order to justify the title of this article needs to be made. Public economy is not to be confused with planning economy. The state remains but one of the producers and delivery agents of public goods and services.

Suggested Citation

  • Ani Matei, 2006. "Public Economy versus Planned Economy. Current Approaches and Problems," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 1(1(496)), pages 98-102, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:agr:journl:v:1(496):y:2006:i:1(496):p:98-102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://store.ectap.ro/articole/26.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.ectap.ro/articol.php?id=26&rid=1
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:agr:journl:v:1(496):y:2006:i:1(496):p:98-102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mircea Dinu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/agerrea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.