IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/agh/journl/v20y2019i1p43-56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methods of limiting selected risk types in the municipal waste incineration plant

Author

Listed:
  • Ewa Kubinska-Jabcon

    (AGH University of Science and Technology)

  • Mariusz Niekurzak

    (AGH University of Science and Technology)

Abstract

Risk has become one of the most important categories in the global economy. This term belongs to the most popular phenomena in the economy. Decision making is always connected with risk. It is an inseparable part of human history and there are no man’s actions which cannot be associated with it. The notion of risk is universal: it concerns political, economic and social activities. It takes on specific meaning in the space of economic activity: taking risk entails certain financial consequences. Due to this fact, the essence of risk, methods of its evaluation, as well as its management are the topics of a growing number of publications in various scientific fields. The key problem for an entrepreneur is to first determine sources of risk, to assess its size and the influence it may have on the business, and then–to take action in order to minimize this influence. The article analyses dangers in a municipal waste incineration plant. In incineration plants there are various risks but environmental threats, broadly analysed in this article, belong to the most serious ones. Two independent risk analysis methods have been used for this purpose to determine the most serious threats related to environmental risk and options of counteracting them.

Suggested Citation

  • Ewa Kubinska-Jabcon & Mariusz Niekurzak, 2019. "Methods of limiting selected risk types in the municipal waste incineration plant," Managerial Economics, AGH University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Management, vol. 20(1), pages 43-56.
    • Handle: RePEc:agh:journl:v:20:y:2019:i:1:p:43-56
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.agh.edu.pl/manage/article/view/3614/2416
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. André P. Liebenberg & Robert E. Hoyt, 2003. "The Determinants of Enterprise Risk Management: Evidence From the Appointment of Chief Risk Officers," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 6(1), pages 37-52, February.
    2. Robert E. Hoyt & Andre P. Liebenberg, 2011. "The Value of Enterprise Risk Management," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 78(4), pages 795-822, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kingsley Alawattegama, 2017. "The Impact of Enterprise Risk Management on Firm Performance: Evidence from Sri Lankan Banking and Finance Industry," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(1), pages 225-225, December.
    2. José Ruiz-Canela López, 2021. "How Can Enterprise Risk Management Help in Evaluating the Operational Risks for a Telecommunications Company?," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-26, March.
    3. Nadine Gatzert & Philipp Reichel, 2022. "Awareness of climate risks and opportunities: empirical evidence on determinants and value from the U.S. and European insurance industry," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 47(1), pages 5-26, January.
    4. Elisabetta Mafrolla & Felice Matozza, 2014. "Risk management and firm size: a survey of Italian private companies," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2014(3), pages 87-108.
    5. Dionne, Georges & El Hraiki, Rayane & Mnasri, Mohamed, 2023. "Determinants and real effects of joint hedging: An empirical analysis of US oil and gas producers," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    6. Malik, Muhammad Farhan & Zaman, Mahbub & Buckby, Sherrena, 2020. "Enterprise risk management and firm performance: Role of the risk committee," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1).
    7. Heidinger, Dinah & Gatzert, Nadine, 2018. "Awareness, determinants and value of reputation risk management: Empirical evidence from the banking and insurance industry," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 106-118.
    8. Evan M. Eastman & Jianren Xu, 2021. "Market reactions to enterprise risk management adoption, incorporation by rating agencies, and ORSA Act passage," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 24(2), pages 151-180, June.
    9. David M. Pooser & Mark J. Browne & Oleksandra Arkhangelska, 2018. "Growth in the Perception of Cyber Risk: Evidence from U.S. P&C Insurers," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 43(2), pages 208-223, April.
    10. Simon Ashby & Trevor Buck & Stephanie Nöth-Zahn & Thomas Peisl, 2018. "Emerging IT Risks: Insights from German Banking," The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance - Issues and Practice, Palgrave Macmillan;The Geneva Association, vol. 43(2), pages 180-207, April.
    11. Walid Ben-Amar & Ameur Boujenoui & Daniel Zeghal, 2014. "The Relationship between Corporate Strategy and Enterprise Risk Management: Evidence from Canada," Journal of Management and Strategy, Journal of Management and Strategy, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(1), pages 1-17, February.
    12. Mark Abkowitz & Janey Camp, 2017. "Structuring an Enterprise Risk Assessment Protocol: Traditional Practice and New Methods," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 20(1), pages 79-97, March.
    13. Johnston, Joseph & Soileau, Jared, 2020. "Enterprise risk management and accruals estimation error," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(3).
    14. Eckles, David L. & Hoyt, Robert E. & Miller, Steve M., 2014. "Reprint of: The impact of enterprise risk management on the marginal cost of reducing risk: Evidence from the insurance industry," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 409-423.
    15. Chien-Ming Huang & Wei Yang & Ren-Qing Zeng, 2020. "Analysis on the Efficiency of Risk Management in the Chinese Listed Companies," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-13, October.
    16. Quick, Reiner & Gauch, Kevin, 2021. "Is assurance on risk management systems relevant for bankers’ decisions?," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 55(C).
    17. Grazia Dicuonzo & Graziana Galeone & Erika Zappimbulso & Vittorio Dell'Atti, 2019. "Risk Management 4.0: The Role of Big Data Analytics in the Bank Sector," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 9(6), pages 40-47.
    18. Ivana Dvorski Lacković & Nataša Kurnoga & Danijela Miloš Sprčić, 2022. "Three-factor model of Enterprise Risk Management implementation: exploratory study of non-financial companies," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(2), pages 101-122, June.
    19. Milos Sprcic, Danijela & Pecina, Ena & Orsag, Silvije, 2017. "Enterprise Risk Management Practices In Listed Croatian Companies," UTMS Journal of Economics, University of Tourism and Management, Skopje, Macedonia, vol. 8(3), pages 219-230.
    20. Eckles, David L. & Hoyt, Robert E. & Miller, Steve M., 2014. "The impact of enterprise risk management on the marginal cost of reducing risk: Evidence from the insurance industry," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 247-261.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:agh:journl:v:20:y:2019:i:1:p:43-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lukasz Lach (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wzaghpl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.