IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/afj/journ4/v9y2024i5p16-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why the preferred creditor status of Africa’s multilateral development banks is being questioned

Author

Listed:
  • Misheck Mutize

    (African Union Support Program)

Abstract

There have been demands1 from international lenders for Africa’s multilateral development banks (MDBs)2 to be stripped off their preferred creditor status (PCS). It became a source of tension in debt restructurings that took place in Zambia and Ghana where loans from MDBs were excluded from debt restructuring. China3 and other creditors whose loans were haircut were calling for equal treatment of all creditors by including their loans in debt restructuring. One of the key economic policy organs of the African Union – the Specialised Technical Committee of Ministers of Finance, Monetary Affairs, Economic Planning and Integration – adopted a declaration4 calling for governments to continue strengthening relations with African Multilateral Institutions including respecting their PCS in line with their Treaties.

Suggested Citation

  • Misheck Mutize, 2024. "Why the preferred creditor status of Africa’s multilateral development banks is being questioned," Development Finance Agenda, Chartered Institute of Development Finance, vol. 9(5), pages 16-17.
  • Handle: RePEc:afj:journ4:v:9:y:2024:i:5:p:16-17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.co.za/doi/abs/10.10520/ejc-defa_v9_n5_a6
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:afj:journ4:v:9:y:2024:i:5:p:16-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk De Doncker (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/afrgrza.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.