IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/jsesro/v4y2015i2p75-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Identifying The Informality Poles At County Level In Romania. Perspectives From Labour Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Adriana AnaMaria DAVIDESCU(ALEXANDRU)

    (Associate Professor, PhD, senior researcher, Department of Statistics and Econometrics, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, National Scientific Institute of Labour and Social Protection)

Abstract

The paper aims to estimate the level of informal employment in Romania and to identify the main informality poles at county level using the labour approach for the period 2000-2013. In order to do that, administrative data from Labour force balance were used providing the official labour use side in the labour market. The empirical approach is based on Crnkovic-Pozaic(1999) and Svec (2009) for Croatia, Nastav ?i Bojnec (2007) for Slovenia. The fundamental hypothesis of the labour approach is that the changes in official population activity rates are caused by factors related to the underground economy. One can suppose that the decreasing of this rate could indicate the existence of a flow of population from official to unofficial economy. The analysis based on development regions revealed that Nord-East, South-West-Oltenia and East-South and South-Muntenia are poles of informality at the level of 2013. At county level, Maramures, Bihor, Salaj, Harghita, Covasna, Alba, Botosani, Neamt, Suceava, Gala?i, Braila, Giurgiu, Calarasi, Ilfov, Gorj ?i Caras-Severin are the main poles of informality at local level for the year 2013. Given results are approximatively and show the level of Romanian shadow economy which is presumably underestimated. These phenomena occur because of available statistics and method limitations.

Suggested Citation

  • Adriana AnaMaria DAVIDESCU(ALEXANDRU), 2015. "Identifying The Informality Poles At County Level In Romania. Perspectives From Labour Approach," Journal of Social and Economic Statistics, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 4(2), pages 75-87, DECEMBER.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:jsesro:v:4:y:2015:i:2:p:75-87
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jses.ase.ro/downloads/Vol4NO2/Davidescu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:ilo:ilowps:375000 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Adriana AnaMaria DAVIDESCU (ALEXANDRU), 2014. "Estimating The Size Of Romanian Shadow Economy. A Labour Approach," Journal of Social and Economic Statistics, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 3(1), pages 25-37, JULY.
    3. Marija Svec, 2009. "Underground Economy in Croatia," Financial Theory and Practice, Institute of Public Finance, vol. 33(4), pages 401-429.
    4. Hussmanns, Ralf., 2004. "Measuring the informal economy : from employment in the formal sector to informal employment," ILO Working Papers 993750003402676, International Labour Organization.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Friedrich Schneider & Mangirdas Morkunas & Erika Quendler, 2021. "Measuring the Immeasurable: The Evolution of the Size of Informal Economy in the Agricultural Sector in the EU-15 up to 2019," CESifo Working Paper Series 8937, CESifo.
    2. Niels-Hugo Blunch, 2015. "Bound to lose, bound to win? The financial crisis and the informal-formal sector earnings gap in Serbia," IZA Journal of Labor & Development, Springer;Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit GmbH (IZA), vol. 4(1), pages 1-34, December.
    3. Roxana Maurizio & Luis Beccaria & Ana Monsalvo, 2022. "Labour Formalization and Inequality: The Distributive Impact of Labour Formalization in Latin America since 2000," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 53(1), pages 117-165, January.
    4. Peter-Cookey, Mayowa Abiodun & Janyam, Kanda, 2017. "Reaping just what is sown: Low-skills and low-productivity of informal economy workers and the skill acquisition process in developing countries," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 11-27.
    5. Germán Guerra & Amado D. Quezada-Sánchez & Claudine Burton-Jeangros & Arturo Júarez-García & Antoine Flahault & Nelly Salgado de Snyder, 2024. "Paid Domestic Work and Depressive Symptoms in Mexico: Results of a National Health Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(12), pages 1-18, November.
    6. Mazhar, Ummad & Méon, Pierre-Guillaume, 2017. "Taxing the unobservable: The impact of the shadow economy on inflation and taxation," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 89-103.
    7. Shaianne T. Osterreich, 2013. "Precarious Work in Global Exports: The Case of Indonesia," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 273-293, April.
    8. Hazans, Mihails, 2011. "What explains prevalence of informal employment in European countries : the role of labor institutions, governance, immigrants, and growth," Policy Research Working Paper Series 5917, The World Bank.
    9. L. Beccaria & S. Filipetto & N. Mura, 2019. "Revisitando un viejo tema: informalidad y ciclo económico," Asociación Argentina de Economía Política: Working Papers 4141, Asociación Argentina de Economía Política.
    10. Simon Deakin & Shelley Marshall & Sanjay Pinto, 2020. "Labour Laws, Informality, and Development: Comparing India and China," Working Papers wp518, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    11. Marji Tania ISSA EID, 2016. "What Do People Want From Their Jobs? A Dual Factor Analysis Based On Gender Differences Drain," Journal of Social and Economic Statistics, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 5(1), pages 42-55, JULY.
    12. Bino Paul & Krishna Muniyoor, 2024. "What Determines the Dichotomy between Formal and Informal Employment: Evidence from Maharashtra, India," The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, Springer;The Indian Society of Labour Economics (ISLE), vol. 67(2), pages 483-499, June.
    13. Luz Adriana Florez, 2015. "The Search and Matching Equilibrium in an Economy with an Informal Sector: A Positive Analysis of Labour Market Policies," Revista Desarrollo y Sociedad, Universidad de los Andes,Facultad de Economía, CEDE, August.
    14. Gheorghe H. Popescu & Adriana Ana Maria Davidescu & Catalin Huidumac, 2018. "Researching the Main Causes of the Romanian Shadow Economy at the Micro and Macro Levels: Implications for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-37, September.
    15. Vasile Valentina & Pisica Silvia, 2011. "Trends Of Employment In Informal Sector In Romania During Crisis;Economic And Social Effects," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(1), pages 234-253, July.
    16. Ouoba, Youmanli & Sawadogo, Natéwindé, 2022. "Food security, poverty and household resilience to COVID-19 in Burkina Faso: Evidence from urban small traders’ households," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    17. Floridi, A. & Wagner, N. & Cameron, J., 2016. "A study of Egyptian and Palestine trans-formal firms – A neglected category operating in the borderland between formality and informality," ISS Working Papers - General Series 619, International Institute of Social Studies of Erasmus University Rotterdam (ISS), The Hague.
    18. Facundo Quiroga‐Martínez & Esteban Fernández‐Vázquez, 2021. "Education as a key to reduce spatial inequalities and informality in Argentinean regional labour markets," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(1), pages 177-189, February.
    19. repec:ilo:ilowps:402835 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Erol Taymaz, 2009. "Informality and Productivity: Productivity Differentials between Formal and Informal Firms in Turkey," ERC Working Papers 0901, ERC - Economic Research Center, Middle East Technical University, revised Mar 2009.
    21. Adriana AnaMaria DAVIDESCU (ALEXANDRU), 2014. "Estimating The Size Of Romanian Shadow Economy. A Labour Approach," Journal of Social and Economic Statistics, Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 3(1), pages 25-37, JULY.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    informal employment; county level; informality map; Romania;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • E26 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Consumption, Saving, Production, Employment, and Investment - - - Informal Economy; Underground Economy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:jsesro:v:4:y:2015:i:2:p:75-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bogdan-Vasile Ileanu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.