IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/infoec/v22y2018i3p75-85.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Ecological View on Software Reuse

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Diana RADU

Abstract

The increase of consumption is an important motivation for the reuse of either physical or virtual products. As the software market has risen, software reuse has become a practice with favourable effects for software development companies and their clients. The most important benefits are increased productivity, reduced costs, better and easier maintenance, decreased development lead times and the improved quality of software products. Successful reuse depends on several technical and non-technical factors. The ecological impact of software is an important non-technical factor of software reuse that needs to be analysed in the context of the rapid evolution of optimization techniques. The main goal of this study is to identify ecological perspectives on software reuse. These will complete the framework of software reuse together with other technical factors, such as compatibility, and non-technical factors, such as economic and ethical implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Diana RADU, 2018. "An Ecological View on Software Reuse," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(3), pages 75-85.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:infoec:v:22:y:2018:i:3:p:75-85
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.revistaie.ase.ro/content/87/07%20-%20radu.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eva Kern, 2018. "Green Computing, Green Software, and Its Characteristics: Awareness, Rating, Challenges," Progress in IS, in: Benoît Otjacques & Patrik Hitzelberger & Stefan Naumann & Volker Wohlgemuth (ed.), From Science to Society, pages 263-273, Springer.
    2. World Commission on Environment and Development,, 1987. "Our Common Future," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192820808.
    3. Daniel R. Cooper & Timothy G. Gutowski, 2017. "The Environmental Impacts of Reuse: A Review," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 21(1), pages 38-56, February.
    4. Sabina-Cristiana Necula & Vasile-Daniel Păvăloaia & Cătălin Strîmbei & Octavian Dospinescu, 2018. "Enhancement of E-Commerce Websites with Semantic Web Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Buddhika M. Hapuwatte & I. S. Jawahir, 2021. "Closed‐loop sustainable product design for circular economy," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 25(6), pages 1430-1446, December.
    2. Szennay, Áron, 2020. "A vállalati társadalmi felelősségvállalás megközelítései és a fenntartható fejlődés [How popular approaches to corporate social responsibility relate to sustainable development]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(10), pages 1057-1074.
    3. Benito-Ostolaza, Juan M. & Ezcurra, Roberto & Osés-Eraso, Nuria, 2020. "Do wealth levels affect the contribution to negative externalities?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    4. Xiaofang Wu & Luoping Zhang & Meifeng Luo, 2020. "Current strategic planning for sustainability in international shipping," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 1729-1747, March.
    5. Aviel Verbruggen, 2011. "Preparing the design of robust climate policy architectures," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 275-295, November.
    6. Jofri Issac & Robert Newell & Colin Dring & Charmaine White & Mohaddese Ghadiri & Stefania Pizzirani & Lenore Newman, 2022. "Integrated Sustainability Planning and Local Food Systems: Examining Areas of and Gaps in Food Systems Integration in Community Sustainability Plans for Municipalities across British Columbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, May.
    7. Ricardo J. Bonilla-Alicea & Katherine Fu, 2019. "Systematic Map of the Social Impact Assessment Field," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-30, July.
    8. Beate Littig, 2002. "The Case for Gender-sensitive Socio-ecological Research," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 16(1), pages 111-132, March.
    9. M. Mahruf C. Shohel & Andrew J. Howes, 2011. "Models of Education for Sustainable Development and Nonformal Primary Education in Bangladesh," Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, , vol. 5(1), pages 129-139, March.
    10. Bokpin, Godfred A., 2017. "Foreign direct investment and environmental sustainability in Africa: The role of institutions and governance," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 39(PA), pages 239-247.
    11. Ram Nayan Yadava & Bhaskar Sinha, 2016. "Scoring Sustainability Reports Using GRI 2011 Guidelines for Assessing Environmental, Economic, and Social Dimensions of Leading Public and Private Indian Companies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 138(3), pages 549-558, October.
    12. de Moerloose Stéphanie, 2015. "The World Bank’s Sustainable Development Approach and the Need for a Unified Field of Law and Development Studies in Argentina," The Law and Development Review, De Gruyter, vol. 8(2), pages 361-388, December.
    13. Kittiya Yongvanich & James Guthrie, 2006. "An extended performance reporting framework for social and environmental accounting," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(5), pages 309-321, September.
    14. Schäpke, Niko & Rauschmayer, Felix, 2012. "Addressing sufficiency: Including altruistic motives in behavioural models for sustainability transitions," UFZ Discussion Papers 17/2012, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS).
    15. Constantin Aurelian Ionescu & Liliana Paschia & Mihaela Denisa Coman, 2019. "Romanian Agriculture and Sustainable Development," Book chapters-LUMEN Proceedings, in: Camelia Ignatescu (ed.), 11th LUMEN International Scientific Conference Communicative Action & Transdisciplinarity in the Ethical Society | CATES 2018 | 23-24 November 2018 | , edition 1, volume 7, chapter 14, pages 156-169, Editura Lumen.
    16. Gábor Megyeri & Kitti Boros & Balázs Fekete, 2022. "A Theoretical Concept of an Innovative and Sustainable Product Based on an Unconventional Approach to Design Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, March.
    17. Luisa Bosetti, 2015. "Engaging stakeholders through Facebook. The case of Global Compact LEAD participants," Proceedings of Business and Management Conferences 3005158, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.
    18. Roland W. Scholz, 2016. "Sustainable Digital Environments: What Major Challenges Is Humankind Facing?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-31, July.
    19. Karine Constant & Marion Davin, 2014. "Environmental Policy and Growth in a Model with Endogenous Environmental Awareness," AMSE Working Papers 1405, Aix-Marseille School of Economics, France, revised Mar 2014.
    20. Agostinho, Feni & Ambrósio, Luís Alberto & Ortega, Enrique, 2010. "Assessment of a large watershed in Brazil using Emergy Evaluation and Geographical Information System," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 221(8), pages 1209-1220.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:infoec:v:22:y:2018:i:3:p:75-85. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Paul Pocatilu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.