IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/infoec/v21y2017i4p85-93.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Project Management Tools for Agile Teams

Author

Listed:
  • Alexandra MIHALACHE

Abstract

The 21st century started as the era of agile methods and technologies which combine adaptable and highly flexible methods designed to help teams to develop applications faster and safer. The challenge is to adapt just enough technology to enhance the performance of teams which are using agile methods and to avoid going back to weak workflow ideas of the industrial era. In this paper, I will present some relevant agile tools that could improve every software development project and I will also mention the features and criteria used for evaluating currently existing tools. Finally, I will propose a classification model to the appropriate agile tool selection, but keep in mind that in order to be successful, organizations and teams do need to deal first with the issues that accompany product complexity and growing teams.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexandra MIHALACHE, 2017. "Project Management Tools for Agile Teams," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(4), pages 85-93.
  • Handle: RePEc:aes:infoec:v:21:y:2017:i:4:p:85-93
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://revistaie.ase.ro/content/84/07%20-%20mihalache.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eduard BUDACU & Paul POCATILU, 2018. "Real Time Agile Metrics for Measuring Team Performance," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(4), pages 70-79.
    2. Hubert BogumiÅ‚, 2020. "Dissimilarities between applied methods of project management impacting regression in business processes and technical architecture," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 16(1), pages 133-168.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:infoec:v:21:y:2017:i:4:p:85-93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Paul Pocatilu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.