Author
Listed:
- Gabriel Popescu
(Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest)
- Ioan Ildiko
(Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest)
Abstract
Rural issues become more and more important since the urban expansion tends to go beyond its social and environmental sustainability. Rural development is a priority objective of the European and international political agenda. It is underpinned by the same factors as development in general. Nevertheless they could come into action only by profound changes in this area. The main challenges arise from the increased competition and the changing role of agriculture. Knowledge transfer addresses a more and more important social need of the knowledge based economy to value research outcomes by up taking it in new products and realistic policies, on the one hand and to perform a demand driven public research, on the other hand. Processes triggered by the profound changes needed in rural area are information intensive so that rural knowledge hubs and gateways gather academic staff, farmers and businesses. There are different approaches to build up such centers that struggle to transform performance research outcomes in successful rural businesses. A survey of the international experience of such initiatives led us to outline the key features that has to be considered in setting up research networks for rural renaissance, such as bottom-up approach, free or heavy subsidized advisory and mentoring services, one-to-one communication, appropriate valuation of information and communication technologies' potential, collaborative work between farmers and entrepreneurs, project based management, businessled initiatives, local products, signposting services, developing business groups, mentor guidance.
Suggested Citation
Gabriel Popescu & Ioan Ildiko, 2007.
"Good practices in knowledge transfer for the development of rural entrepreneurship,"
The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 9(22), pages 209-216, June.
Handle:
RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:9:y:2007:i:22:p:209-216
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
JEL classification:
- R10 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General Regional Economics - - - General
- R50 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Regional Government Analysis - - - General
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:9:y:2007:i:22:p:209-216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Dumitru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.