IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aes/amfeco/v14y2012ispecial_no_6p653-664.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perception of Private and Public Medical Services In Romania

Author

Listed:
  • Eva-Cristina Petrescu

    (Academy of Economic Studies of Bucharest, Romania)

  • Diana-Eugenia Ioncică

    (Academy of Economic Studies of Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

This paper presents the Romanian medical system and the modality in which the State through the government-funded public healthcare system protects its citizens. Legislation is an important instrument which can create the premises for an adequate protection of health. Recently, the Law on healthcare reform, which concerns the organization of hospitals, has led to major debates. The private medical services are an alternative which started to develop. In this context, we conducted an exploratory research in order to analyze the perception of private and public medical services in Romania, by using quantitative market research techniques (market survey). The research showed that the public system is perceived as not satisfactory and a reform of the system is perceived as being opportune, but the solution is not simply the diminution of the charges. Moreover, the research revealed the fact that the private medical services in Romania are not sufficiently developed. The subjects interviewed consider that the State plays a major role in the reform of the medical system and that there are important measures that the state should implement.

Suggested Citation

  • Eva-Cristina Petrescu & Diana-Eugenia Ioncică, 2012. "Perception of Private and Public Medical Services In Romania," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(Special N), pages 653-664, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:14:y:2012:i:special_no_6:p:653-664
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_1157.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ana-Lucia Ristea & Ion Stegaroiu & Valeriu Ioan-Franc & Vasile Dinu, 2009. "Responsiveness of Health Systems: a Barometer of the Quality of Health Services," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 11(26), pages 277-287, June.
    2. State Olimpia & Popescu Delia, 2008. "Leadership And Social Responsability," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 10(23), pages 72-79, February.
    3. Bennedsen, Morten & Schultz, Christian, 2011. "Arm's length delegation of public services," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(7-8), pages 543-552, August.
    4. Thompson, Ceri R. & McKee, Martin, 2004. "Financing and planning of public and private not-for-profit hospitals in the European Union," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 281-291, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Claudia Gabriela Baicu & Olimpia State, 2012. "Banking Models Under the Impact of the Post-Crisis Organizational Changes Apt to Confer Sustainable Financial Stability - Romanian Experience," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(32), pages 436-450, June.
    2. Sarel, Roee & Demirtas, Melanie, 2021. "Delegation in a multi-tier court system: Are remands in the U.S. federal courts driven by moral hazard?," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    3. Saeid Homayoun & Zabihollah Rezaee & Zahra Ahmadi, 2015. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Its Relevance to Accounting," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(9), pages 178-178, September.
    4. Maria Ioncică & Eva-Cristina Petrescu & Diana Ioncică, 2012. "Transports and Consumers’ Ecological Behaviour," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(31), pages 70-83, February.
    5. Jing Du & Hongyue Wu & Xianbo Zhao, 2018. "Critical Factors on the Capital Structure of Public–Private Partnership Projects: A Sustainability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-27, June.
    6. Hellowell, Mark, 2013. "PFI redux? Assessing a new model for financing hospitals," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 77-85.
    7. Roxana Sarbu & Adriana Zamfir, 2011. "The Necessity of Implementing a Quality Management System in the Romanian Medical Units. An Approach from the Patients Point of View," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 13(Special N), pages 679-687, November.
    8. Marta Pinzone & Emanuele Lettieri & Cristina Masella, 2015. "Proactive Environmental Strategies in Healthcare Organisations: Drivers and Barriers in Italy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 131(1), pages 183-197, September.
    9. Thompson, Ceri R. & McKee, Martin, 2011. "An analysis of hospital capital planning and financing in three European countries: Using the principal-agent approach to identify the potential for economic problems," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(2), pages 158-166, February.
    10. Acerete, Basilio & Stafford, Anne & Stapleton, Pamela, 2011. "Spanish healthcare public private partnerships: The ‘Alzira model’," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 22(6), pages 533-549.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    private medical services; public medical services; perception of medical services; market survey;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D12 - Microeconomics - - Household Behavior - - - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis
    • I10 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health - - - General
    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aes:amfeco:v:14:y:2012:i:special_no_6:p:653-664. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Valentin Dumitru (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aseeero.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.