IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aeq/aeqaeq/v59_y2013_i3_q3_p197-207.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to Fight Terrorism: The Relevance of Qualitative Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Peter J. Phillips

Abstract

Using qualitative comparative statics we analyse terrorist choice and government strategy in a context where the qualities or characteristics of the terrorist's various alternatives are salient to his decision-making. Orthodox choice theory can be used to show what happens when government strategy increases the terrorist's material or opportunity costs. However, when such a government strategy deliberately or inadvertently emphasises or advertises a particular quality or characteristic of a particular legitimate alternative to political violence, it is possible that this information, intended to alert terrorists to changes in relative costs, increases rather than decreases terrorism. The analysis complements the application of the orthodox model of choice to the study of terrorist behaviour and provides additional insights that are relevant for the development of effective government strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter J. Phillips, 2013. "How to Fight Terrorism: The Relevance of Qualitative Economics," Applied Economics Quarterly (formerly: Konjunkturpolitik), Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, vol. 59(3), pages 197-207.
    • Handle: RePEc:aeq:aeqaeq:v59_y2013_i3_q3_p197-207
    DOI: 10.3790/aeq.59.3.197
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3790/aeq.59.3.197
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers (2008 onwards); Pay-per-view access from http://ejournals.duncker-humblot.de/loi/aeq or from http://www.genios.de (2006 onwards with 2 years moving wall)
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.3790/aeq.59.3.197?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Peter J. Phillips & Gabriela Pohl, 2017. "Terrorist choice: a stochastic dominance and prospect theory analysis," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 150-164, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aeq:aeqaeq:v59_y2013_i3_q3_p197-207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Deborah Anne Bowen (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.duncker-humblot.de .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.