IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aem/journl/v7y2021i1p44-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Industrial Property and Investment in the Research in the Business Sector – Comparative Study Czech Republic and Poland

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea TOMÁŠKOVÁ
  • Roman ŚMIETAŃSKI

Abstract

The authors analyzed data on the topic with using descriptive statistics method for answers five research questions which are in line with the aim of the article. The aim of the paper is to perform a comparative study in the field of intellectual property and investment in research in the business sector in the Czech Republic and Poland. Data were drawn from statistical offices in the Czech Republic and Poland. In the Czech Republic. Data was processed using descriptive statistics. The number of patents and utility models has been declining in recent years, while in Poland their number is growing. On the other hand, there is a growing trend of companies investing in science and research, both in the Czech Republic and in Poland. The impulse for companies to invest in R&D is also part of long-term innovation strategies in both countries. In the Czech Republic, it is the strategy of the Czech Republic Country For The Future 2019 - 2030 and in Poland, it is the Long-term national development strategy. The article is important for making a comparison of the issue. This will be the basis for initiating academic research cooperation using tools from the long-term development strategies of both countries, which will bring implicit added value.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea TOMÁŠKOVÁ & Roman ŚMIETAŃSKI, 2021. "Industrial Property and Investment in the Research in the Business Sector – Comparative Study Czech Republic and Poland," Eastern European Journal for Regional Studies (EEJRS), Center for Studies in European Integration (CSEI), Academy of Economic Studies of Moldova (ASEM), vol. 7(1), pages 44-69, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:aem:journl:v:7:y:2021:i:1:p:44-69
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.53486/2537-6179.7-1.03
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://csei.ase.md/journal/files/issue_71/EEJRS_Issue_71_44-69_TOM.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.53486/2537-6179.7-1.03?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jie Hu & Guo Li & Feifei Zhu, 2017. "Regional Financial Developments and Research and Development Investment–Cash Flow Sensitivity: Evidence on Chinese Public High†Tech Companies," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 17(4), pages 627-643, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hoffmann, Arvid O.I. & Kleimeier, Stefanie, 2021. "How do banks finance R&D intensive firms? the role of patents in overcoming information asymmetry✰," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).
    2. Arvid O. I. Hoffmann & Stefanie Kleimeier, 2021. "Financial disclosure readability and innovative firms' cost of debt," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 21(2), pages 699-713, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    patent; utility model; investment; research and development; Czech Republic; Poland.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O31 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives
    • O32 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aem:journl:v:7:y:2021:i:1:p:44-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Rodica CRUDU (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/acecsmd.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.