IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aem/journl/v10y2024i1p120-136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Variables Of Quantifying Reputational Damages Resulting From Unfair Competition Actions

Author

Listed:
  • Iulian MORARU

Abstract

The problem of quantifying the reputational damage resulting from unfair competition actions derives mainly from the lack of contextually established criteria. In the same sense, the lack of relevant judicial precedents amplifies the precarious state of the system of indicative benchmarks in order to assess the damage to reputation as a result of affecting the rights and legitimate interests of the victims of unfair competition actions. Foreign methodological systems for quantifying damages caused by unfair competition actions could represent points of reference for the domestic legislator in the idea of solving practical difficulties in the process of assessing damages caused by unfair competition actions. An eloquent example could be considered the French model for evaluating the economic damage resulting from actions of unfair competition, developed by notorious practitioners in the field in question. The methodological sheets are generically called "La réparation du préjudice économique. Fiches méthodologiques et glossaire - 3e édition (2024)".

Suggested Citation

  • Iulian MORARU, 2024. "Variables Of Quantifying Reputational Damages Resulting From Unfair Competition Actions," Eastern European Journal for Regional Studies (EEJRS), Center for Studies in European Integration (CSEI), Academy of Economic Studies of Moldova (ASEM), vol. 10(1), pages 120-136, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:aem:journl:v:10:y:2024:i:1:p:120-136
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.53486/2537-6179.10-1.07
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://csei.ase.md/journal/files/issue_101/EEJRS_Issue10.1_page-120-136.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.53486/2537-6179.10-1.07?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    quantification; assessment; harm; damage; unfair competition; criteria; methodology.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • K23 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Regulated Industries and Administrative Law

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aem:journl:v:10:y:2024:i:1:p:120-136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Rodica CRUDU (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/acecsmd.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.