IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/aea/aecrev/v65y1975i3p467-72.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Required Disclosure and the Stock Market: Comment

Author

Listed:
  • Friend, Irwin
  • Westerfield, Randolph

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Friend, Irwin & Westerfield, Randolph, 1975. "Required Disclosure and the Stock Market: Comment," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 65(3), pages 467-472, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:65:y:1975:i:3:p:467-72
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Battalio, Robert & Hatch, Brian & Loughran, Tim, 2011. "Who benefited from the disclosure mandates of the 1964 Securities Acts Amendments?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 17(4), pages 1047-1063, September.
    2. Asish K. Bhattacharyya & Sadhalaxmi Vivek Rao, 2005. "Economic Impact of 'Regulation on Corporate Governance': Evidence from India," Finance 0504002, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Harold Mulherin, J., 2007. "Measuring the costs and benefits of regulation: Conceptual issues in securities markets," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 13(2-3), pages 421-437, June.
    4. Zhang, Ivy Xiying, 2007. "Economic consequences of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 44(1-2), pages 74-115, September.
    5. Hanno Merkt, 2006. "Das Informationsmodell im Gesellschafts- und Kapitalmarktrecht," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 58(55), pages 24-60, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aea:aecrev:v:65:y:1975:i:3:p:467-72. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michael P. Albert (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aeaaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.