IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adx/journl/v6y2024i3p210-217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Profitability of Organic Versus Conventional Rice Production: An Evidence from South Asia

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Asim Yasin
  • Muhammad Asim Yasin
  • Sami Ullah
  • Rafaqet Ali
  • Saad Munir

Abstract

Rice, a staple and cash crop in South Asia, is vital for small-scale farmers, but concerns about the profitability of organic farming challenge its adoption despite its environmental benefits. The present study was conducted in the Rice-Wheat zone of three South Asian countries to make a comparison of profit efficiency in rice production under organic and conventional farming systems and to examine factors affecting profit efficiency. A multistage sampling technique was employed to collect cross-sectional data. Profit efficiency was determined by employing Cobb Douglas's functional form of stochastic profit frontier. Results show that the mean profit efficiency of organic rice growers is 0.89 less than conventional rice growers (0.910) in Pakistan. The mean profit efficiencies of organic growers are higher than conventional growers in Nepal and Bangladesh. Education and the role of the extension department are important factors in increasing the efficiency of organic and conventional farming while access to credit and experience in rice farming are significant in reducing inefficiencies in conventional rice farming. The study concludes that the education of farmers, the role of extension services, and easy credit access are key policy variables to improve profit efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Asim Yasin & Muhammad Asim Yasin & Sami Ullah & Rafaqet Ali & Saad Munir, 2024. "Profitability of Organic Versus Conventional Rice Production: An Evidence from South Asia," Journal of Economic Impact, Science Impact Publishers, vol. 6(3), pages 210-217.
  • Handle: RePEc:adx:journl:v:6:y:2024:i:3:p:210-217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.scienceimpactpub.com/journals/index.php/jei/article/view/991/588
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adx:journl:v:6:y:2024:i:3:p:210-217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iqbal Javed (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.scienceimpactpub.com/journals/index.php .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.