IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adx/jessjr/v5y2024i3p28-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Gender Differences in the Perception of Ethics and Civic Moral Disengagement in Medical Doctors

Author

Listed:
  • Sauliha Ali
  • Asma Majeed
  • Zara Haroon
  • Komal Faisal

Abstract

The present study aims to find the gender differences in the perception of doctors while making ethical decisions and their level of civic morality. A simple distinction between ethics and morality would be that ethics are in reference to an external source, they come from the work environment. A comparative research design has been used in this study for which a Purposive sampling strategy was selected. The participants of the study selected were 75 male and 75 female doctors aged 25-40 years, practicing in Jinnah Hospital and Services Hospital, Lahore. Ethics Position Questionnaire (EPQ) and Moral Disengagement Scale (MDS) were utilized to collect the data. To identify the differences among the variables Independent Sample T-test was administered on the collected data. The results of the study revealed that there is no significant difference in the perception of ethics and civic moral disengagement, this brought to the view that gender alone does not influence one’s ethics, pro-social reasoning, and behavior. The findings of this current research state that there are no differences among doctors working in two different locations, among genders, or between ethics and civic moral disengagement. This would be helpful to know because doctors constantly face questions regarding ethics and have to make fast, effective decisions that will affect their patient's life.

Suggested Citation

  • Sauliha Ali & Asma Majeed & Zara Haroon & Komal Faisal, 2024. "Gender Differences in the Perception of Ethics and Civic Moral Disengagement in Medical Doctors," Journal of Education and Social Studies, Science Impact Publishers, vol. 5(3), pages 28-34.
  • Handle: RePEc:adx:jessjr:v:5:y:2024:i:3:p:28-34
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.scienceimpactpub.com/journals/index.php/jess/article/view/917/541
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adx:jessjr:v:5:y:2024:i:3:p:28-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Shahbaz Ahmad (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.scienceimpactpub.com/journals/index.php .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.