IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adr/anecst/y2007i87-88p351-372.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Explaining the Geography of Copatenting in the Scientific Community: a Social Network Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Caroline Hussler
  • Patrick Ronde

Abstract

Based on micro data on the networks of innovation of a French science university, we empirically test whether or not technological knowledge created by academic scientists diffuses in a larger geographic area when the scientists who take part in this technology transfer have a more far-reaching social network. We only find partial network effects, the spatial diffusion of technological knowledge not being significantly and homogeneously influenced by the researchers' positions within the network of science.

Suggested Citation

  • Caroline Hussler & Patrick Ronde, 2007. "Explaining the Geography of Copatenting in the Scientific Community: a Social Network Analysis," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 87-88, pages 351-372.
    • Handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2007:i:87-88:p:351-372
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27650054
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bastien Bernela & Rachel Levy, 2017. "Collaboration networks within a French cluster: Do partners really interact with each other?," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 96(1), pages 115-138, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2007:i:87-88:p:351-372. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Secretariat General or Laurent Linnemer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ensaefr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.