IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adr/anecst/y2007i87-88p325-350.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Radical Innovation and Network Evolution. The Effect of the Genomic Revolution on the Evolution of the Pharmaceutical R&D Network

Author

Listed:
  • Sandra Philippen
  • Massimo Riccaboni

Abstract

This paper uses longitudinal data to examine how a radical technological innovation affects alliance formation of firms and subsequent network structures. We find that it requires radical technological change for firms to leave their embedded path of existing alliances and form new alliances with new partners. While new partners are mostly found through the firms'existing network, network, we provide some insight into "distant" link formation with unknown partners, which together create a small-world network structure

Suggested Citation

  • Sandra Philippen & Massimo Riccaboni, 2007. "Radical Innovation and Network Evolution. The Effect of the Genomic Revolution on the Evolution of the Pharmaceutical R&D Network," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 87-88, pages 325-350.
  • Handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2007:i:87-88:p:325-350
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27650053
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xu Bai & Jinxi Wu & Yun Liu & Yihan Xu, 2020. "Research on the impact of global innovation network on 3D printing industry performance," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(2), pages 1015-1051, August.
    2. Jackie Krafft & Francesco Quatraro & Pier Saviotti, 2014. "Knowledge characteristics and the dynamics of technological alliances in pharmaceuticals: empirical evidence from Europe, US and Japan," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 587-622, July.
    3. Patrick Wolf & Tobias Buchmann, 2021. "Analyzing development patterns in research networks and technology," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 55-81, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2007:i:87-88:p:325-350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Secretariat General or Laurent Linnemer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ensaefr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.