IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adr/anecst/y2004i75-76p135-153.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Enterprise Strategies in a Market Open to Domestic and International Competition

Author

Listed:
  • Mehrdad Sepahvand

Abstract

The emerging literature on interaction between strategic trade theory and mixed oligopoly uses a simple example to argue that if the domestic market is open to foreign competition and the government uses a production subsidy then it is socially preferable to privatise the domestic public enterprise even if it is just as efficient as its private counterparts. This study evaluates the robustness of this result by extending it to a general framework. Furthermore, it argues that allocative efficiency gains attributed to privatisation may also be explained by giving the public enterprise a first mover advantage (as a Stackelberg leader). Thus it suggests it is the timing of the game rather than the ownership structure which is responsible for the inefficiency associated with the presence of a public enterprise in a market open to international competition.

Suggested Citation

  • Mehrdad Sepahvand, 2004. "Public Enterprise Strategies in a Market Open to Domestic and International Competition," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 75-76, pages 135-153.
    • Handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2004:i:75-76:p:135-153
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20079098
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guangliang Ye, 2016. "Leadership and Privatisation in a Mixed Multi-product Oligopoly: An Endogenous Timing Model," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(2), pages 170-180, June.
    2. Denis Claude & Mabel Tidball, 2010. "Efficiency inducing taxation for polluting oligopolists: the irrelevance of privatization," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 30(4), pages 2946-2954.
    3. Rabah Amir & Giuseppe Feo, 2014. "Endogenous timing in a mixed duopoly," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 43(3), pages 629-658, August.
    4. Oscar Amerighi & Giuseppe Feo, 2017. "Tax competition for foreign direct investments and the nature of the incumbent firm," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 19(4), pages 811-826, August.
    5. Carlo Capuano & Giuseppe De Feo, 2009. "On Public Inefficiencies in a Mixed Duopoly," Working Papers 0916, University of Strathclyde Business School, Department of Economics.
    6. John S. Heywood & Guangliang Ye, 2009. "Mixed Oligopoly, Sequential Entry, And Spatial Price Discrimination," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 47(3), pages 589-597, July.
    7. Denis Claude & Mabel Tidball, 2010. "Efficiency inducing taxation for polluting oligopolists: the irrelevance of privatization," Post-Print hal-02655045, HAL.
    8. Mehrdad Sepahvand & Richard C. Cornes, 2007. "Ownership Versus Timing Of The Game," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(4), pages 305-314, December.
    9. Oscar Amerighi & Giuseppe De Feo, 2000. "On the FDI-Attracting Property of Privatization," Working Papers 3_214, Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche e Statistiche, Università degli Studi di Salerno.
    10. John S. Heywood & Guangliang Ye, 2009. "Privatisation And Timing In A Mixed Oligopoly With Both Foreign And Domestic Firms," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(4), pages 320-332, December.
    11. O. Amerighi & G. De Feo, 2007. "Competition for FDI in the Presence of a Public Firm and the Effects of Privatization," Working Papers 605, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
    12. Denis Claude & Mabel Tidball, 2010. "Efficiency inducing taxation for polluting oligopolists: the irrelevance of privatization," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 30(4), pages 2946-2954.
    13. Denis Claude & Mabel Tidball, 2010. "Efficiency inducing taxation for polluting oligopolists: the irrelevance of privatization," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 30(4), pages 2946-2954.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2004:i:75-76:p:135-153. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Secretariat General or Laurent Linnemer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ensaefr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.