IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adr/anecst/y2003i71-72p143-172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does crime affect unemployment? The Role of social networks

Author

Listed:
  • Antoni Calvo-Armengol
  • Yves Zenou

Abstract

In this paper, we consider a community of individuals that are embedded within a net work of social relationships. Each individual has tight and permanent relationships with close friends and relatives (strong ties) as well as random and transitory interactions within the community (weak ties). Workers can either be employed or unemployed. Some workers do not even participate in the labor market because they are engaged in criminal activities. Unemployed workers can find a job through strong ties (assumed not to be criminals), weak ties (some of them being criminals) as well as through formal methods (such as advertisement or employment agencies). We show that crime rate within a community increases the unemployment rate of this community. Indeed, when the crime rate increases, weak ties become less valuable in terms of information content about jobs since the likelihood to interact with a criminal is higher. The overall job information available through personal contacts decreases, frictions in the labor market are exacerbated, and unemployment rises.This predicted inter play between crime and unemployment, grounded on the social setting, is reminiscent of the epidemic theory of ghettos.

Suggested Citation

  • Antoni Calvo-Armengol & Yves Zenou, 2003. "Does crime affect unemployment? The Role of social networks," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 71-72, pages 143-172.
  • Handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2003:i:71-72:p:143-172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20079051
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Paolo Buonanno, 2006. "Crime, Education and Peer Pressure," Rivista di Politica Economica, SIPI Spa, vol. 96(5), pages 89-110, September.
    2. Paolo Buonanno, 2003. "The Socioeconomic Determinants of Crime. A Review of the Literature," Working Papers 63, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised Nov 2003.
    3. Paolo Buonanno, 2003. "Identifying the Effect of Education on Crime. Evidence from the Italian Regions," Working Papers 65, University of Milano-Bicocca, Department of Economics, revised Nov 2003.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adr:anecst:y:2003:i:71-72:p:143-172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Secretariat General or Laurent Linnemer (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ensaefr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.