IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adp/joajnn/v8y2018i5p83-94.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Different Modalities of anterior Cervical Discectomy for Treatment of Single and Double Level Cervical Disc Herniation

Author

Listed:
  • Hassan Mohammed
  • Mohamed Abd El Baset Khalaf
  • Roshdy Abd El Aziz El Khayat

    (Neurosurgery Department, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut, Egypt)

Abstract

Cervical disc herniation and degenerative disease of the cervical spine are the most common causes of cervical cord and nerve root dysfunction. It is found that after the age of 40 almost 60% of the population will have radiographic evidence of degenerative changes, and after the age of 65, 95% of men and 70% of women have radiographic evidence of degenerative changes [1]. Since the first description of the anterior cervical discectomy with fusion by Cloward and Smith in 1958 respectively in 1955, and the cervical anterior discectomy without fusion in 1960 by Hirsch a debate is started which of both methods is the best. While this discussion is still not closed, the advent of the cervical disc prosthesis has contributed to extra confusion. Instead of two possibilities, nowadays three possible treatments concur with each other: anterior cervical discectomy without implantation of any structure, anterior cervical discectomy with fusion, and finally, cervical discectomy with implantation of disc prosthesis [2]. Nowadays anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) may be considered the standard procedure for treatment of degenerative disc disease of the cervical spine. However, there is evidence that ACDF may result in progressive degeneration of the adjacent segments [3].

Suggested Citation

  • Hassan Mohammed & Mohamed Abd El Baset Khalaf & Roshdy Abd El Aziz El Khayat, 2018. "Evaluation of Different Modalities of anterior Cervical Discectomy for Treatment of Single and Double Level Cervical Disc Herniation," Open Access Journal of Neurology & Neurosurgery, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 8(5), pages 83-94, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:adp:joajnn:v:8:y:2018:i:5:p:83-94
    DOI: 10.19080/OAJNN.2018.08.555748
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://juniperpublishers.com/oajnn/pdf/OAJNN.MS.ID.555748.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://juniperpublishers.com/oajnn/OAJNN.MS.ID.555748.php
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.19080/OAJNN.2018.08.555748?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adp:joajnn:v:8:y:2018:i:5:p:83-94. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Thomas (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.