IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adp/artoaj/v25y2020i2p94-100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land Use Planning Using Geospatial Technology and Soil Health Card Data for A Micro Watershed in Sub Tropical Humid Region of Meghalaya

Author

Listed:
  • Sam Kaninda Tshikala

    (Post-Doctoral Research Fellow, Department of Agriculture and Applied Economics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602)

  • Esendugue Greg Fonsah

    (Professor and REI Coordinator, Department of Agriculture and Applied Economics, University of Georgia, Tifton, Georgia, USA, and Extraordinary Professor, School of Business and Governance at the Potchefstroom Campus, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa)

  • George Boyhan

    (Professor, Department of Horticulture, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602)

  • Elizabeth Little

    (Associate Professor, Department of Plant Pathologist, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602)

  • Julia Gaskin

    (Sustainable Agriculture Coordinator, Department of Crop & Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602)

Abstract

Land use planning based on soil, slope, existing land use land cover and knowledge of the ecology and socio- economy was done for micro watershed 3B2A1d2d of Digaru watershed located in Meghalaya. High resolution Google image was used to prepare present land use land cover map. Areas suitable for rice, maize and pineapple were identified using geospatial technology based on land evaluation using information on soil, slope, rainfall and temperature and requirements of crops. Alternate land use plan was prepared based on crop suitability and existing land user. The study reveals that soils are high in organic carbon and nitrogen, moderately acidic in reaction and medium in phosphorus and potassium. Soils are sufficient in iron and copper. Zinc and manganese is deficient in 21.88% and 3.92% area. Crop suitability analysis reveals that only 57 ha area is suitable for rice and 144 ha area is suitable for maize and pineapple. Based on crop suitability, low lying areas are suggested for rice and maize and pineapple is suggested on uplands. Areas not suitable for any crop are suggested for afforestation.

Suggested Citation

  • Sam Kaninda Tshikala & Esendugue Greg Fonsah & George Boyhan & Elizabeth Little & Julia Gaskin, 2020. "Land Use Planning Using Geospatial Technology and Soil Health Card Data for A Micro Watershed in Sub Tropical Humid Region of Meghalaya," Agricultural Research & Technology: Open Access Journal, Juniper Publishers Inc., vol. 25(2), pages 94-100, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:adp:artoaj:v:25:y:2020:i:2:p:94-100
    DOI: 10.19080/ARTOAJ.2020.25.556301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://juniperpublishers.com/artoaj/pdf/ARTOAJ.MS.ID.556301.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://juniperpublishers.com/artoaj/ARTOAJ.MS.ID.556301.php
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.19080/ARTOAJ.2020.25.556301?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Nijkamp & Jacques Poot, 1998. "original: Spatial perspectives on new theories of economic growth," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 32(1), pages 7-37.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paolo Caro, 2018. "To be (or not to be) resilient over time: facts and causes," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 60(2), pages 375-392, March.
    2. Jaewon Lim & Changkeun Lee & Euijune Kim, 2015. "Contributions of human capital investment policy to regional economic growth: an interregional CGE model approach," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 55(2), pages 269-287, December.
    3. Baycan, Tüzin & Sahin, Mediha & Nijkamp, Peter, 2012. "The urban growth potential of second-generation migrant entrepreneurs: A sectoral study on Amsterdam," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 971-986.
    4. Henri L.F. de Groot & Jacques Poot & Martijn J. Smit, 2007. "Agglomeration, Innovation and Regional Development: Theoretical Perspectives and Meta-Analysis," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 07-079/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    5. Wagner, John E., 2000. "Regional Economic Diversity: Action, Concept, or State of Confusion," Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, Mid-Continent Regional Science Association, vol. 30(2), pages 1-22.
    6. Timo Mitze & Torben Schmidt, 2015. "Internal migration, regional labor markets and the role of agglomeration economies," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 55(1), pages 61-101, October.
    7. Anna Iara, 2005. "Regional growth in Hungary - The impact of European economic integration," ERSA conference papers ersa05p342, European Regional Science Association.
    8. Sjoerd Beugelsdijk & Niels Noorderhaven, 2004. "Entrepreneurial attitude and economic growth: A cross-section of 54 regions," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 38(2), pages 199-218, June.
    9. Raouf Boucekkine & Giorgio Fabbri & Salvatore Federico & Fausto Gozzi, 2019. "Growth and agglomeration in the heterogeneous space: a generalized AK approach," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(6), pages 1287-1318.
    10. Malecki, Edward J., 2000. "Soft Variables in Regional Science," The Review of Regional Studies, Southern Regional Science Association, vol. 30(1), pages 61-69, Summer.
    11. Ulrich Zierahn, 2012. "The importance of spatial autocorrelation for regional employment growth in Germany," Review of Regional Research: Jahrbuch für Regionalwissenschaft, Springer;Gesellschaft für Regionalforschung (GfR), vol. 32(1), pages 19-43, March.
    12. Beugelsdijk, S. & van Schaik, A.B.T.M., 2001. "Social Capital and Regional Economic Growth," Other publications TiSEM 874f4bc4-bef9-499c-829e-0, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    13. Ridhwan, M.M. & Nijkamp, P. & Rietveld, P., 2008. "Regional development and monetary policy : a review of the role of monetary unions, capital mobility and locational effects," Serie Research Memoranda 0007, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    14. Ismoil Khujamkulov & Sohrab Abizadeh, 2023. "Trends in tax revenues of transition economies: an empirical approach," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 64(2), pages 833-868, February.
    15. Brian Cushing & Jacques Poot, 2004. "Crossing boundaries and borders: Regional science advances in migration modelling," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Raymond J. G. M. Florax & David A. Plane (ed.), Fifty Years of Regional Science, pages 317-338, Springer.
    16. Steven Bond-Smith, 2021. "The unintended consequences of increasing returns to scale in geographical economics [Investing for prosperity: skills, infrastructure and innovation]," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 21(5), pages 653-681.
    17. Edward J. Feser, 2003. "What Regions Do Rather than Make: A Proposed Set of Knowledge-based Occupation Clusters," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 40(10), pages 1937-1958, September.
    18. Gabor Hunya & Mark S. Knell & Roman Römisch & Hermine Vidovic, 2003. "wiiw Structural Report 2003 on Central and Eastern Europe, Volume 2," wiiw Structural Report 2, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, wiiw.
    19. Mark V. JANIKAS & Sergio J. REY, 2005. "Spatial Clustering, Inequality And Income Convergence," Region et Developpement, Region et Developpement, LEAD, Universite du Sud - Toulon Var, vol. 21, pages 45-64.
    20. Niebuhr, Annekatrin, 2000. "Räumliche Wachstumszusammenhänge – Empirische Befunde für Deutschland," HWWA Discussion Papers 84, Hamburg Institute of International Economics (HWWA).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adp:artoaj:v:25:y:2020:i:2:p:94-100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Robert Thomas (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.