Author
Listed:
- Xianfei Yan
- Xiumei Chu
- Nan Ge
- Dong Wang
- Yudong Han
- Shixun Wang
- Yang Li
- Panpan Wang
- Yongjie Wang
Abstract
Background. Lobectomy by video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) has become a well-established and widespread therapeutic method for treating early lung cancer. However, VATS, especially VATS lobectomy, is still associated with moderate acute postoperative pain. The optimal strategy for postoperative analgesia after VATS lobectomy remains undetermined. Anesthesiologists and surgeons thus require an evidence-based VATS pain management approach. Methods. We retrospectively analyzed 352 patients who underwent VATS (either lobectomy or wedge resection). The patients were divided into four groups for comparative analysis of analgesic effects and safety: Group A, patient-controlled analgesia (PCA); Group B, PCA + flurbiprofen axetil (FA); Group C, PCA + FA + tramadol hydrochloride; and Group D, PCA + FA + a buprenorphine transdermal system (BTDS). Results. All 352 patients were included in the primary analysis. The analgesic effect in Group D was significantly better than that in the other three groups on postoperative days 2 and 3 (P = 0.035 and P = 0.001, respectively). Patients in Group D had better outcomes with respect to the postoperative day of chest tube removal (P = 0.000), volume of chest tube drainage (P = 0.024), and postoperative day of discharge (P = 0.000). However, the medical expense of hospitalization was not significantly different among the four groups (P = 0.809). Conclusions. Multimodal analgesia involving PCA + FA + BTDS provides effective analgesia; fewer analgesia-related complications; and a reduced patient economic burden, healthcare workload, and opioid requirement.
Suggested Citation
Xianfei Yan & Xiumei Chu & Nan Ge & Dong Wang & Yudong Han & Shixun Wang & Yang Li & Panpan Wang & Yongjie Wang, 2019.
"Postoperative Analgesia in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis,"
International Journal of Sciences, Office ijSciences, vol. 8(03), pages 102-108, March.
Handle:
RePEc:adm:journl:v:8:y:2019:i:3:p:102-108
DOI: 10.18483/ijSci.1977
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adm:journl:v:8:y:2019:i:3:p:102-108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Staff ijSciences (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.