IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adm/journl/v7y2018i4p46-55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Community Involvement and Ecotourism in Doi Inthanon National Park, Thailand

Author

Listed:
  • Meemana Jiraya

Abstract

Ecotourism has been identified as one of the tourism’s subsector that is fastest growing globally. Ecotourism offers opportunity to the local people in learning and using the area as attractions for the tourists. It’s not only sustain the conservation of the environment, but also improve the welfare of local people, especially people staying within the area. The direct involvement of local community in management of resources area will encourage them to appreciate the value of the resources and fight against any form of misuse or encroachment, as they have the sense of the belonging and responsibility to the area. Thailand is one of rich flora, fauna and cultural diversity country and becoming one of the popular ecotourism destination. According to the definition by the National Parks Act, Thailand has 154 national parks covering an area of 6.24 million hectares, includes both terrestrial and marine parks such as the highest land of Thailand “Doi Inthanon National Park†. This paper highlights the involvement of local community in Doi Inthanon National Park, where there are 9,792 residents living within the national park. Currently, there are four villages has been involved directly in the ecotourism activities of the Doi Inthanon National Park. However, there are no coordination among the groups that involved in the ecotourism activities, which may lead to unsustainable and confuse among the tourist. Realizing that problem, this paper recommends that relevant authorities to coordinate and help local community by providing guidance and capacity building.

Suggested Citation

  • Meemana Jiraya, 2018. "Community Involvement and Ecotourism in Doi Inthanon National Park, Thailand," International Journal of Sciences, Office ijSciences, vol. 7(04), pages 46-55, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:adm:journl:v:7:y:2018:i:4:p:46-55
    DOI: 10.18483/ijSci.1634
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ijsciences.com/pub/article/1634
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.ijsciences.com/pub/pdf/V72018041634.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18483/ijSci.1634?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cohen, John M. & Uphoff, Norman T., 1980. "Participation's place in rural development: Seeking clarity through specificity," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 8(3), pages 213-235, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pilar Useche, 2016. "Who Contributes to the Provision of Public Goods at the Community Level? The Case of Potable Water in Ghana," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 34(6), pages 869-888, November.
    2. Hofer, Katrin & Wicki, Michael & Kaufmann, David, 2024. "Public support for participation in local development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    3. Abdalla, Fadhila Hassan & Samah, Asnarulkhad Abuu & Hashim, Ahmad Hariza & Rosnon, Moh’d Roslan, 2022. "Relationship between Socio-Economic Factors and Participation in Decision Making in Tourism Industry among Women in Zanzibar," OSF Preprints gs5re, Center for Open Science.
    4. Phusit Phukamchanoad, 2022. "The innovative approach to sufficiency economy in Thailand’s Northeastern region provinces," Journal of Community Positive Practices, Catalactica NGO, issue 1, pages 20-33.
    5. Jalaluddin Abdul Malek & Seng Boon Lim & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2021. "Social Inclusion Indicators for Building Citizen-Centric Smart Cities: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-29, January.
    6. Handberg, Øyvind Nystad, 2018. "No sense of ownership in weak participation: a forest conservation experiment in Tanzania," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(4), pages 434-451, August.
    7. Worstell, James & Colley, Barry, 1993. "Enabling Resilience and Enhancing Assets: Famine Mitigation from a Seeds and Tools Perspective," USDA Miscellaneous 336999, United States Department of Agriculture.
    8. Masjhoer Jussac Maulana & Vitrianto Primantoro Nur, 2024. "Community engagement in waste reduction: A critical component for Gunung Sewu Geopark conservation, Yogyakarta, Indonesia," Environmental & Socio-economic Studies, Sciendo, vol. 12(2), pages 1-12.
    9. Subhan Mollick, Abdus & Khalilur Rahman, Md. & Nabiul Islam Khan, Md. & Nazmus Sadath, Md., 2018. "Evaluation of good governance in a participatory forestry program: A case study in Madhupur Sal forests of Bangladesh," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 123-137.
    10. Siriluck Thammanu & Hee Han & E. M. B. P. Ekanayake & Yoonkoo Jung & Joosang Chung, 2021. "The Impact on Ecosystem Services and the Satisfaction Therewith of Community Forest Management in Northern Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-31, December.
    11. White, Robert & Eicher, Carl K., 1999. "Ngo'S And The African Farmer: A Skeptical Perspective," Staff Paper Series 11532, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    12. Allan Kasapa & Charles Gyan, 2023. "Community Participation in Planning Social Infrastructure Delivery in Ghana’s Local Government: A Case Study of Shai Osudoku District," Journal of Development Policy and Practice, , vol. 8(2), pages 264-285, July.
    13. Malin Hasselskog, 2020. "What happens to local participation when national ownership gets stronger? Initiating an exploration in Rwanda and Cambodia," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 38(S1), pages 91-111, May.
    14. M. Morrison , Kevin & Singer, Matthew M., 2006. "The Challenges of “Deliberative Development”: Bolivia’s Experience with a National Dialogue," Documentos de trabajo 5/2006, Instituto de Investigaciones Socio-Económicas (IISEC), Universidad Católica Boliviana.
    15. G.Ananda Vadivelu, 2006. "Choosing not to Participate--Evidence from Drought-Prone Area Programme in Chitradurg, Karnataka," Working Papers id:312, eSocialSciences.
    16. Mangku Purnomo & Erekso Hadiwiyono & Novil Dedy Andriatmoko & Imaniar Ilmi Pariasa & Asihing Kustanti & Heiko Faust, 2022. "Transformation Role of Forest Farmer Group’s (FFGs) in Indonesia from Development Agent to Brokering Project," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    17. Emmanuel Botlhale, 2013. "Extending Budgetary Participation beyond Budget Pitsos in Botswana," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 31(6), pages 717-735, November.
    18. Andrea Cornwall & Garett Pratt, 2011. "The use and abuse of participatory rural appraisal: reflections from practice," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 28(2), pages 263-272, June.
    19. Mbeche, Robert & Ateka, Josiah & Herrmann, Raoul & Grote, Ulrike, 2021. "Understanding forest users' participation in participatory forest management (PFM): Insights from Mt. Elgon forest ecosystem, Kenya," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    20. Shrestha, Sujata & Shrestha, Uttam Babu, 2017. "Beyond money: Does REDD+ payment enhance household's participation in forest governance and management in Nepal's community forests?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 63-70.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adm:journl:v:7:y:2018:i:4:p:46-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Staff ijSciences (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.