IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adm/journl/v7y2018i10p24-29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Clinical Comparison of Robot-Assisted and Conventional Thoracotomy with Mitral Valvuloplasty

Author

Listed:
  • Liming YIN
  • Sumin YANG

Abstract

Objective To compare the clinical therapeutic effects of robot-assisted and conventional thoracotomy with mitral valvuloplasty, and to further clarify the advantages and disadvantages of the Da Vinci robotic surgery system in cardiac surgery. Method A total of 116 patients with mitral valvuloplasty were enrolled from November 2014 to July 2018 in the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, which included 38 cases of the robot-assisted mitral valvuloplasty and 78 cases of conventional thoracotomy with mitral valvuloplasty; the clinical treatment of the two patient groups was compared and analyzed. Result The surgical outcomes of the two groups were satisfactory and there were no deaths in the hospital. The operation time, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time, and ascending aorta occlusion time were longer in the Da Vinci group than in the conventional group (P 0.05). Conclusion Robotic technique can be safely and effectively be applied in mitral valvuloplasty, and can significantly shorten the ICU time, tracheal intubation time and postoperative hospital stay, also reduce postoperative blood transfusion, postoperative drainage, and incidence of postoperative complications. Robot-assisted surgery is a good choice for minimally invasive surgery, but its operation time, extracorporeal circulation time and ascending aorta occlusion time are longer than conventional surgery, and further improvement is needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Liming YIN & Sumin YANG, 2018. "Clinical Comparison of Robot-Assisted and Conventional Thoracotomy with Mitral Valvuloplasty," International Journal of Sciences, Office ijSciences, vol. 7(10), pages 24-29, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:adm:journl:v:7:y:2018:i:10:p:24-29
    DOI: 10.18483/ijSci.1809
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ijsciences.com/pub/article/1809
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.ijsciences.com/pub/pdf/V72018101809.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18483/ijSci.1809?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adm:journl:v:7:y:2018:i:10:p:24-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Staff ijSciences (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.