IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adm/journl/v5y2016i3p107-112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision (ELAPE) and Abdominal - Perineal Resection (APR)

Author

Listed:
  • Lu Yun
  • Xiao-Tang Zhao
  • Wan-Bin Yin

Abstract

To compare the difference between the extralevator abdominoperineal excision (ELAPE) and abdominal - perineal resection (APR) in circum ferencial resection margin (CRM) positive rate, intraoperative perforation (IOP) the incidence of postoperative wound infection, incision infection reoperation rate, surgical indications, operation time, hemorrhage volume, the recurrence rate, postoperative quality of life (perineal pain, urinary and reproductive function). By searching the literature about ELAPE and APR , reviewed their clinical value. ELAPE has greater advantages in reducing the CRM ,IOP and the recurrence rate in patients with low colorectal cancer , lowert he hemorrhage volume than the APR, but surgical area larger defects appear perineal pain, increase the incidence of urinary and reproductive dysfunction, and longer operative time with respect to the APR. APR is the first choice for low colorectal cancer patient with cT1 ~ 2 or ycT0 ~ 2 period ; after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapyand tumor stage ycT3 ~ 4 stage patients ELAPE is more appropriate, ELAPE in postoperative complications, postoperative quality of life aspect is also worth to wait.

Suggested Citation

  • Lu Yun & Xiao-Tang Zhao & Wan-Bin Yin, 2016. "Comparison of Extralevator Abdominoperineal Excision (ELAPE) and Abdominal - Perineal Resection (APR)," International Journal of Sciences, Office ijSciences, vol. 5(03), pages 107-112, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:adm:journl:v:5:y:2016:i:3:p:107-112
    DOI: 10.18483/ijSci.976
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ijsciences.com/pub/article/976
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.ijsciences.com/pub/pdf/V5201603976.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18483/ijSci.976?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adm:journl:v:5:y:2016:i:3:p:107-112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Staff ijSciences (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.