IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adm/journl/v5y2016i11p14-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Science and Religion: Are They Complimentary or in Conflict?

Author

Listed:
  • Graham Nicholson

Abstract

Science and religion are seen by many as being in opposition such that they cannot be reconciled. The modern rise of science and scientific materialism have been accompanied by a decline in religious belief, particularly in the West. Religious believers, especially those in religious orders, have always had a tendency to descend into dogmatism in the assertion of what they perceive to be absolute spiritual truth. This was most severely challenged by the rise of science in the Renaissance. This led to the development of a healthy skepticism about many religious claims, especially as religion had at that time descended to a considerable degree into states of corruption, self-interest, literalism and superstition, at odds with the original teachings of the founder. This approach was further advanced by the Darwinian theories of evolution, in opposition to the ‘once only’ view of Divine creation. But the debate has since moved on to a developing, new understanding of the relationship between science and religion, as illustrated in the Baha’i teachings.

Suggested Citation

  • Graham Nicholson, 2016. "Science and Religion: Are They Complimentary or in Conflict?," International Journal of Sciences, Office ijSciences, vol. 5(11), pages 14-22, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:adm:journl:v:5:y:2016:i:11:p:14-22
    DOI: 10.18483/ijSci.1120
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ijsciences.com/pub/article/1120
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.ijsciences.com/pub/pdf/V52016111120.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18483/ijSci.1120?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adm:journl:v:5:y:2016:i:11:p:14-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Staff ijSciences (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.