IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adm/journl/v2y2013i7p101-104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Evaluation Instrument for Interviewing Skills in Psychiatry

Author

Listed:
  • Wen-Ching Chen
  • Miao-Chan Juan
  • Hsiang-Nan Lu
  • Yueh-Yu Wu

Abstract

Background: Instruments to assess nurses’ interviewing skills for in psychiatry are rare. In this study, we use such an instrument to identify and evaluate interviewing skills. Methods: We designed a 6-month training program with 12 courses. The first 10 courses included didactic lectures combined with role-playing exercises to teach interviewing skills. We used an evaluation instrument that emphasized the six main elements of interviewing, including opening statements, conversation starters, empathetic statements, statements of the concrete effects of the patient’s behavior, encouragement of the patient to discuss and identify conflict solutions that are mutually acceptable, and closing statements. In the last two courses, three examiners evaluated the nurses’ interviewing skills.Results: Four participants attended the training course two times, with an average score of 60.0. Two participants attended the course four, five or seven times, with average scores of 45.0, 52.5, and 72.5, respectively. One participant attended the course eight times and received a score of 82.5.Conclusion: This study found that the more times the nurses engaged in the training course, the higher score their score in the assessment of interviewing skills. Because of this dose-response relationship, we suggest that this instrument is valuable for evaluating communication skills in difficult situations in psychiatric wards.

Suggested Citation

  • Wen-Ching Chen & Miao-Chan Juan & Hsiang-Nan Lu & Yueh-Yu Wu, 2013. "An Evaluation Instrument for Interviewing Skills in Psychiatry," International Journal of Sciences, Office ijSciences, vol. 2(07), pages 101-104, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:adm:journl:v:2:y:2013:i:7:p:101-104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ijsciences.com/pub/article/213
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.ijsciences.com/pub/pdf/V2-201307-25.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adm:journl:v:2:y:2013:i:7:p:101-104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Staff ijSciences (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.