IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/adi/ijbess/v6y2024i4p373-383.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative analysis of selected political party manifestos in South Africa convergences, differences, and implications in public service delivery

Author

Listed:
  • France Khutso Lavhelani Kgobe

    (University of Limpopo, Department of Development Planning and Management)

  • Magatane Tshwarelo Mashilo

    (University of Limpopo, Department of Business Management (HRM), Sovenga, Polokwane, 0727, South Africa)

  • Mohale Enerst Selolo

    (Department of Development Planning and Management, University of Limpopo,)

  • Dilo Justin Ramoshaba

    (University of Limpopo, Department of Social Work, Sovenga, Polokwane, 0727, South Africa)

  • Mathibedi Frank Kgarose

    (Department of Public Administration, University of Limpopo,)

Abstract

This article presents a comparative analysis of selected political party manifestos in South Africa, examining both convergences and differences in their approaches to service delivery. With a focus on understanding the underlying principles and priorities outlined in these manifestos, the study aims to shed light on the potential implications for governance and public service effectiveness. Drawing upon a comprehensive review of political party manifestos and policy documents, the analysis identifies common themes such as access to basic services, infrastructure development, and socio-economic empowerment. However, significant variations emerge in terms of the strategies proposed to address these challenges, reflecting diverse ideological orientations and policy priorities among political parties. By employing a qualitative content analysis approach, the study highlights the nuanced differences in the proposed policy frameworks and implementation mechanisms, as well as the underlying assumptions and values embedded within each manifesto. Furthermore, the analysis explores the potential implications of these variations for public administration practices, governance structures, and service delivery outcomes. Through this comparative lens, the article contributes to a deeper understanding of the complexities and dynamics shaping public administration in South Africa's multi-party democracy. Moreover, it offers insights into the challenges and opportunities for enhancing service delivery effectiveness, fostering accountability, and promoting inclusive development. Ultimately, the findings underscore the importance of informed policy debates and evidence-based decision-making in addressing the diverse needs and aspirations of South Africa's citizens, while also emphasizing the critical role of public administration in translating political commitments into tangible outcomes on the ground.

Suggested Citation

  • France Khutso Lavhelani Kgobe & Magatane Tshwarelo Mashilo & Mohale Enerst Selolo & Dilo Justin Ramoshaba & Mathibedi Frank Kgarose, 2024. "Comparative analysis of selected political party manifestos in South Africa convergences, differences, and implications in public service delivery," International Journal of Business Ecosystem & Strategy (2687-2293), Bussecon International Academy, vol. 6(4), pages 373-383, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:adi:ijbess:v:6:y:2024:i:4:p:373-383
    DOI: 10.36096/ijbes.v6i4.547
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.bussecon.com/ojs/index.php/ijbes/article/view/547/322
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.36096/ijbes.v6i4.547
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.36096/ijbes.v6i4.547?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adi:ijbess:v:6:y:2024:i:4:p:373-383. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Umit Hacioglu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ibihutr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.