Human in Economics and Human Economics

The paper examines the problems of anthropogenesis in the light of the system paradigm. The purpose of the study is to improve the tools of system economics. As a hypothesis, the author formulates provisions according to which there is a balance between man and the real world created by him. The subject of the study is the conditions of anthropogenesis in various socio- economic systems. For this purpose, the author considers knowledge as an immaterial force in the processes of material transformation. The topic of subjectivity, the conditions of assembly and disintegration of the whole into parts, in which man acts as a super- complex quantum-mechanical observer of complexity, included in the synergistic flow of interweaving, are studied in detail. The method of synthesis of the systemic representation of the world and the provisions of the systemic economy, which is the main one in the work, allowed to formulate methodological additions for future economic research. In particular, a theoretical statement is developed that provides for the leveling of methodological subjectivism in the design of economic reality by a tetrad representation. The emerging term «tetrad thinking» is proposed to be used in scientific circulation together with the Man remaining in the economy and moving in a synergistic flow of increasing complexity. The above acts as a scientific novelty for this work. The author's view of spatio-temporal sweeps implies the presence of their center – a person who reflects and makes a choice. Human activity in the economy is analyzed from the standpoint of various types of scientific rationality. The «human» component is determined in the formation of new spatio-temporal «windows». The assertion about the insufficiency of the transfer of one information component in evolutionary theories is substantiated – the human ability to process chaos is also required not only in the creation of new economic worlds, but also in overcoming the anti-entropic leap in the existing hyper-complicated world. The provisions proposed in the work, aimed at improving the tools of the system economy, are limited by the breadth of the cognitive subject in economic reality. This creates prospects for further developments to search for the interrelations of knowledge forms with the boundaries of socio-economic systems and their stability.