IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ach/journl/y2020id811.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reviewers

Author

Listed:
  • article Editorial

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • article Editorial, 2020. "Reviewers," Russian Journal of Industrial Economics, MISIS, vol. 12(4).
    • Handle: RePEc:ach:journl:y:2020:id:811
    DOI: undefined
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ecoprom.misis.ru/jour/article/viewFile/811/690
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/undefined?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Benedict E. DeDominicis, 2021. "The Common Agricultural Policy Of The European Union And Bulgaria: Critiquing The New York Times 2019 Expos㉠Of Corruption In The Common Agricultural Policy," International Journal of Management and Marketing Research, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 14(1), pages 35-61.
    2. Benedict E. DeDominicis, 2021. "American Economic Nationalism: Corporatist, Neoliberal And Neocorporatist Political Strategic Responses To Contemporary Global Systemic Crises," Review of Business and Finance Studies, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 12(1), pages 1-30.
    3. Dong Wook Kim & Hye Young Jang & Yousun Ko & Jung Hee Son & Pyeong Hwa Kim & Seon-Ok Kim & Joon Seo Lim & Seong Ho Park, 2020. "Inconsistency in the use of the term “validation” in studies reporting the performance of deep learning algorithms in providing diagnosis from medical imaging," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(9), pages 1-10, September.
    4. Ahmad Yaman Abdin & Muhammad Jawad Nasim & Yannick Ney & Claus Jacob, 2021. "The Pioneering Role of Sci in Post Publication Public Peer Review (P4R)," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ach:journl:y:2020:id:811. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Главный контакт редакции (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://misis.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.