IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ach/journl/y2017id562.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Role of public policy in improving the investment attractiveness in industry

Author

Listed:
  • I. L. Vorotnikov
  • K. P. Kolotyrin
  • T. N. Malakhova

Abstract

Material production is the basis for the economy. The result of the development of the sphere of material production will be largely depend on the directions of the state industrial policy, which should be formed at the federal level and should be brought to a logical understanding and practical implementation at the level of individual regions. In conditions of systemic economic crisis, whose consequences are already apparent to the national economy, industrial development requires new approaches to management of production and state involvement in the investment process. There was developed for this purpose and adopted for the implementation of state program named “Development of industry and improve its competitiveness†, which includes a complex of subprograms, directed at the development of various sectors of Russian industry, from the military-industrial complex to the food industry. There’s a program specified volumes of budget financing and targets that must be reached in each of these industries. However, in the first period (to 2016) of implementation of the program targets are not been met. At observance of full funding was not achieving the planned growth of industrial production and productivity in any industry. It discusses the possible reasons for the negative results. For example, the program does not stipulate the organizational and economic mechanisms and program-targeted tools that can be used to solve practical problems and to achieve the goals set out in the program. Also in the program there are no data on the sources and amounts of private investment. It is a sign of a compensatory nature to stimulate the development of domestic industry. Not only must indicate potential sources of private investment, but also indicate the mechanisms which they can be involved in the development of industrial production, because a private investor, in the first place, interested in guarantees of profit from investment. The government can provide this result through the establishment of a favorable investment climate. There can be used the same degree and market and administrative resources for these purposes. Combining them into a system creates incentives for investment activity in the sectors of domestic production.Â

Suggested Citation

  • I. L. Vorotnikov & K. P. Kolotyrin & T. N. Malakhova, 2017. "Role of public policy in improving the investment attractiveness in industry," Russian Journal of Industrial Economics, MISIS, issue 4.
  • Handle: RePEc:ach:journl:y:2017:id:562
    DOI: 10.17073/2072-1633-2016-4-329-334
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ecoprom.misis.ru/jour/article/viewFile/562/519
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17073/2072-1633-2016-4-329-334?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. Kudrin & E. Gurvich., 2014. "A New Growth Model for the Russian Economy," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 12.
    2. Alexeev, Michael & Kurlyandskaya, Galina, 2003. "Fiscal federalism and incentives in a Russian region," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 20-33, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Olga Romanova & Yevgeniy Starikov, 2015. "Changes in the Vector of Industrial Policy and Possibilities for Innovative Development of the Industrial Regions," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(3), pages 322-333.
    2. Pertti Haaparanta & Tuuli Juurikkala & Olga Lazareva & Jukka Pirttila & Laura Solanko & Ekaterina Zhuravskaya, 2003. "Firms And Public Service Provision In Russia," Working Papers w0041, New Economic School (NES).
    3. Klepach, A., 2015. "Lessons from Modern Crisis for Economic Development in Russia," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 26(2), pages 210-218.
    4. Berkowitz, Daniel & DeJong, David N., 2011. "Growth in post-Soviet Russia: A tale of two transitions," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 79(1), pages 133-143.
    5. A. K. Solov’ev, 2022. "Problems of Application of the Substitution Coefficient as a Criterion of Efficiency of the Pension System of Russia," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 176-184, April.
    6. Vladimir Alexandrovich Shamakhov & Aleksei Igorevich Balashov, 0. "The New Socio-Political Normality and the Lessons of the Post-Soviet Modernization of Public Administration," Administrative Consulting, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management., issue 12.
    7. Ketenci, Natalya, 2015. "Capital mobility in Russia," Russian Journal of Economics, Elsevier, vol. 1(4), pages 386-403.
    8. Elena Stupnikova & Tatyana Sukhadolets, 2019. "Construction Sector Role in Gross Fixed Capital Formation: Empirical Data from Russia," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-16, May.
    9. Libman, Alexander, 2013. "Natural resources and sub-national economic performance: Does sub-national democracy matter?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 82-99.
    10. Alexeev, Michael & Chernyavskiy, Andrey, 2018. "A tale of two crises: Federal transfers and regional economies in Russia in 2009 and 2014–2015," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 175-185.
    11. Simone Auer & Emidio Cocozza & Andrea COlabella, 2016. "The financial systems in Russia and Turkey: recent developments and challenges," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 358, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    12. Michael Alexeev, 2016. "Fiscal Incentives in Federations: Russia and the US Compared," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 58(4), pages 485-506, December.
    13. Brigitte Evelyne Granville & Carol Scott Leonard, 2006. "Do institutions matter for technological change in transition economies? The case of the Russia's 89 regions and republics," UCL SSEES Economics and Business working paper series 70, UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies (SSEES).
    14. Libman, Alexander, 2008. "Federalism and regionalism in transition countries: A survey," MPRA Paper 29196, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    15. David N. DeJong & Daniel Berkowitz, 2008. "Growth in Post-Soviet Russia: A Tale of Two Transitions," Working Paper 369, Department of Economics, University of Pittsburgh, revised Sep 2008.
    16. Gontmakher, E., 2015. "Health and Welfare: in Search of Balance of Interests," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 26(2), pages 259-264.
    17. Pertti Haaparanta & Tuuli Juurikkala & Olga Lazareva & Jukka Pirttila & Laura Solanko & Ekaterina Zhuravskaya, 2003. "Firms And Public Service Provision In Russia," Working Papers w0041, Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR).
    18. Fokin, Nikita, 2021. "The importance of modeling structural breaks in forecasting Russian GDP," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 63, pages 5-29.
    19. Kudrin, A. & Gurvich, E., 2015. "Government Stimulus or Economic Incentives?," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, vol. 26(2), pages 179-186.
    20. Haaparanta, Pertti & Juurikkala, Tuuli, 2007. "Bribes and local fiscal autonomy in Russia," BOFIT Discussion Papers 12/2007, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ach:journl:y:2017:id:562. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Главный контакт редакции (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://misis.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.