IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/acf/journl/y2021id1787.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strategic Diagnostics of the Industry as a Strategizing Object

Author

Listed:
  • N. I. Sasaev

Abstract

The changes associated with the strengthening of existing trends, the translation of global trends to regional and national levels, the emergence of new trends and their scaling up to the world level, leads to a transformation of conditions and the emergence of new strategic factors of economic development. This non-stationary process, which declares both negative and positive aspects, complicates the monitoring, search and selection of long-term guidelines for the industrial development of the economy, which justifies the relevance of the development of the methodological apparatus for strategizing industries.The industrial strategy developed in accordance with the general theory of strategy and the methodology of strategizing, the founder of which is Foreign Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences Vladimir L. Kvint, is designed to systematize and take into account the variability of conditions, the variety of strategic factors and emerging opportunities, decompose the latter to the level of strategic priorities, the implementation of which will generate high efficiency over the entire horizon of strategizing.At the same time, the general theory of strategy is a young science, being in constant contact with practice, the theoretical foundations and methodological provisions of its main directions, including industrial, are still at the stage of formation and improvement.Making correct and reasonable strategic decisions increasingly depends on the depth of studying the object of strategizing. In this regard, the purpose of this article was to disclose one of the preparatory stages for the development of a strategy, namely, the study of the industry as an object of strategizing.The article justifies the necessity of dividing the analysis of the industry as an object of strate-gizing into two stages: strategic diagnostics (the study of the main characteristics, features, the current trajectory of development and potential), and OTSW-analysis (the study of the object of industrial strategizing from the position of searching for future prospects, choosing a vector of long-term development and forming a trajectory of movement in the chosen direction). In addition, the author indicates the potential elements of strategic diagnostics of the industry as an object of strategizing and reveals the key aspects of each of the areas of analysis.

Suggested Citation

  • N. I. Sasaev, 2021. "Strategic Diagnostics of the Industry as a Strategizing Object," Administrative Consulting, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management., issue 9.
    • Handle: RePEc:acf:journl:y:2021:id:1787
    DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139-2021-9-58-68
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/viewFile/1787/1476
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22394/1726-1139-2021-9-58-68?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. I. V. Novikova, 2018. "Strategic management of labor resources," Russian Journal of Industrial Economics, MISIS, vol. 11(4).
    2. Edmund Phelps, 2015. "Mass Flourishing: How Grassroots Innovation Created Jobs, Challenge, and Change," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 10058-2.
    3. M. D. Grinchenko, 2021. "Analysis of Strategic Trends in the Development of the Russian Meat Industry," Administrative Consulting, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management., issue 1.
    4. A. G. Aganbegyan, 2017. "Investments in fixed assets and human capital: Two interconnected drivers of socioeconomic growth," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 361-363, July.
    5. S. E. Tsivilev, 2020. "Kuzbass 2035: National Interests and Strategic Priorities of the Regional Development," Russian Journal of Industrial Economics, MISIS, vol. 13(3).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. K. V. Shevchenko, 2022. "Strategic analysis of labour market of the Amur region (data taken form HeadHunter and SuperJob web-platforms)," Russian Journal of Industrial Economics, MISIS, vol. 15(2).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Michela Chessa & Benjamin Prissé, 2024. "The Evaluation of Creativity," GREDEG Working Papers 2024-16, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    2. P. G. Babu, 2016. "Mass Flourishing and Corporatism: Two Indian Stories," Homo Oeconomicus: Journal of Behavioral and Institutional Economics, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 43-49, August.
    3. Giuseppe Attanasi & Ylenia Curci & Patrick Llerena & Maria del Pino Ramos-Sosa & Adriana Carolina Pinate & Giulia Urso, 2019. "Looking at Creativity from East to West: Risk Taking and Intrinsic Motivation in Socially and Culturally Diverse Countries," Working Papers of BETA 2019-38, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    4. Christopher J. Boudreaux & Niklas Elert & Magnus Henrekson & David S. Lucas, 2022. "Entrepreneurial accessibility, eudaimonic well-being, and inequality," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 59(3), pages 1061-1079, October.
    5. Remy Guichardaz & Julien Pénin, 2021. "Entrepreneurs “from within”? Schumpeter and the challenge of endogenizing novelty," Working Papers of BETA 2021-41, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    6. D. Roderick Kiewiet, 2016. "What’s Right, and What’s Wrong, with “What is Wrong with the West’s Economies?” by Edmund Phelps," Homo Oeconomicus: Journal of Behavioral and Institutional Economics, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 11-18, August.
    7. Ian Goldin & Pantelis Koutroumpis & François Lafond & Julian Winkler, 2024. "Why Is Productivity Slowing Down?," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 62(1), pages 196-268, March.
    8. Dong, Jielin & Li, Wei & Cao, Yuhua & Fang, Jianwen, 2016. "How does technology and population progress relate? An empirical study of the last 10,000years," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 57-70.
    9. Amani, Elnasri & Fox, Kevin J., 2015. "R&D, Innovation and Productivity: The Role of Public Support," KDI Journal of Economic Policy, Korea Development Institute (KDI), vol. 37(1), pages 73-96.
    10. Changfei Nie & Wen Luo & Yuan Feng & Zhi Chen, 2023. "The Impact of Economic Growth Target Constraints on Environmental Pollution: Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-23, February.
    11. Jean-Alain Héraud & Nathalie Popiolek, 2022. "Research management models to promote breakthrough innovation: analyzing success case stories of simultaneous discovery-invention research processes," Working Papers of BETA 2022-12, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    12. Wakkee, Ingrid & van der Sijde, Peter & Vaupell, Christiaan & Ghuman, Karminder, 2019. "The university's role in sustainable development: Activating entrepreneurial scholars as agents of change," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 195-205.
    13. Kjell Hausken & John F. Moxnes, 2019. "Innovation, Development and National Indices," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 1165-1188, February.
    14. Kushlin, Valery Ivanovich (Кушлин, Валерий Иванович) & Ustenko, V.S. (Устенко, В.С.), 2016. "Analysis of International Experience of Intensification of Scientific and Innovative Activity in the Modern Unstable Conditions [Анализ Международного Опыта Активизации Научно-Инновационной Деятель," Working Papers 2832, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    15. Kevin L. Kliesen & John A. Tatom, 2018. "Here’s Why U.S. Manufacturing Is Fundamentally Strong," Economic Synopses, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, issue 4, pages 1-4.
    16. Peter J. Boettke & Rosolino A. Candela & Peter J. Jacobsen, 2023. "Economic calculation and transaction costs: The case of the airline oversales auction system," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 89(3), pages 708-731, January.
    17. Vartanov, Sergey, 2020. "Стратегический Подход К Анализу Медиасистемы России [A strategic approach to Russian media system analysis]," MPRA Paper 105224, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Godlewska Malgorzata & Mackiewicz Marta, 2023. "Local context of local government participation in the innovation networks: Evidence from Poland," International Journal of Management and Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, Collegium of World Economy, vol. 59(3), pages 243-263, September.
    19. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/6qk99khogd86non732alvigmuq is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Grzegorz Olczyk, 2019. "Elements of economic culture as informal institutions in the economic development of Germany," Ekonomia i Prawo, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 18(2), pages 233-244, June.
    21. Giuseppe Attanasi & Michela Chessa & Sara Gil-Gallen & Patrick Llerena, 2021. "A survey on experimental elicitation of creativity in economics," Revue d'économie industrielle, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 273-324.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:acf:journl:y:2021:id:1787. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://sziu.ranepa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.