IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/acf/journl/y2021id1588.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Internet Governance Institutes: Comparative Analysis of Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan

Author

Listed:
  • L. V. Smorgunov

Abstract

Belarus, Russia and Kazakhstan are among the highly developed countries in the UN e-Government Development Index. With a high rate of digitalization of public administration, solving the problems of citizens' access to the Internet and developing the electronic services sector, these countries differ from each other in the design of a digitalization policy. The structure of digitalization projects in these countries includes all the necessary components — strategy, coordination, evaluation, intervention, but it is distinguished by a focus on digital change and a political infrastructure that ensures technology interference in the public sphere. Among the significant factors of digitalization policy in the described cases, the idea of sovereignty related to the Internet and digital technologies stands out. The general policy of the countries included in the Eurasian space of cooperation is expressed by the principle of “digital sovereignty†. The article analyses the general understanding of the principle of “digital sovereignty† and the various strategies for its implementation — “multilateral interaction†, “stakeholdercooperation†and “centralized management†, as well as the institutions of management that provide them.

Suggested Citation

  • L. V. Smorgunov, 2021. "Public Internet Governance Institutes: Comparative Analysis of Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan," Administrative Consulting, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. North-West Institute of Management., issue 12.
  • Handle: RePEc:acf:journl:y:2021:id:1588
    DOI: 10.22394/1726-1139-2020-12-24-39
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.acjournal.ru/jour/article/viewFile/1588/1343
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22394/1726-1139-2020-12-24-39?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:acf:journl:y:2021:id:1588. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://sziu.ranepa.ru .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.