Author
Listed:
- N. V. Bondarchuk
- V. K. Spilnichenko
Abstract
The article considers the content of the innovative abilities of a company as a modern economic category, defines their elemental composition, issues of the development management and approaches to evaluation. The purpose of the article is to develop scientific knowledge about the innovative activity of a company in the direction of determining its resource, process and effective content. The goal determines the need to combine an integrated approach with a monographic research method and tools for qualitative and quantitative analysis. As a result of the research, the content of the innovative abilities of the company as a category inherent in the knowledge economy is determined. The authors describe the range of range of components of the company’s innovative abilities: financial, personnel, technological, informational and organizational. Assumptions are made about the composition of qualitative and quantitative indicators necessary to study the state and dynamics of the company’s innovative abilities. The issues of development management are presented in the form of the authors’ hypothesis on the construction of a roadmap, which provides for measures aimed at stimulating the development of innovative abilities of a company in the context of digitalization of the economy. As the information base for the study they use the work of Russian scientists published over the past five years on the development of innovative abilities of firms in the context of digitalization, as well as statistical data from open sources and the authors’ own observations. It is assumed that the article will be useful for management specialists focusing on issues of managing innovative development and the resource potential of a company.
Suggested Citation
N. V. Bondarchuk & V. K. Spilnichenko, 2025.
"Managing the development of the company’s innovative abilities in the context of digitalization,"
RSUH/RGGU BULLETIN. Series Economics. Management. Law, Russian State University for the Humanities (RSUH), issue 1.
Handle:
RePEc:aca:journl:y:2025:id:625
DOI: 10.28995/2073-6304-2025-1-33-48
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aca:journl:y:2025:id:625. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Ð ÐµÐ´Ð°ÐºÑ†Ð¸Ñ (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.