IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abz/journl/y2017id74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Problem of selection of indicators, reflecting the proportion of high-tech products in the global market

Author

Listed:
  • V. G. Zinov
  • N. G. Kurakova
  • O. V. Cherchenko

Abstract

According to the results of the implementation of the priority «industry of nanosystems» an analysis of the use mechanism of protection of intellectual property rights in the global namespace. Argues that only the intellectual property identificeret prospects for capturing a share of the global market of science-intensive products.Therefore, to capture and consolidate global technological leadership in the postindustrial society, primarily in the form of its institutionalization in the system of world standards intellectual property. Noted that the reports of UNESCO and the world intellectual property organization (WIPO), published in 2015, the Program of nanoindustry development in the Russian Federation recognized as not effective in the criterion of low patent activity. The data of the patent analysis in three technological fields of nanotechnology, highlighted WIPO’s as mainstream, estimated the share of Russian patents in the world portfolio in each of these areas.The conclusion about the fundamental relevance of this indicator the priority areas as «the number patents with a priority of the Russian Federation, obtained in foreign countries» to assess the country’s share in the global market high-tech products.

Suggested Citation

  • V. G. Zinov & N. G. Kurakova & O. V. Cherchenko, 2017. "The Problem of selection of indicators, reflecting the proportion of high-tech products in the global market," Economics of Science, Delo Publishing house, vol. 2(4).
    • Handle: RePEc:abz:journl:y:2017:id:74
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ecna.elpub.ru/jour/article/viewFile/74/74
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Yi-Wen & Yang, Ya-Po & Wang, Leonard F.S. & Wu, Shih-Jye, 2014. "Technology licensing in mixed oligopoly," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 193-204.
    2. Bagchi, Aniruddha & Mukherjee, Arijit, 2014. "Technology licensing in a differentiated oligopoly," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 455-465.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. О. Р. Yeremchenko, 2017. "A trend of international collaborations between inventers," Economics of Science, Delo Publishing house, vol. 3(3).
    2. Tatyana Volkova, 2019. "Implementing the Potential of Intellectual Products’ Commercialisation in the International Trading System," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(1), pages 242-255.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Huaige & Wang, Xuejun & Qing, Ping & Hong, Xianpei, 2016. "Optimal licensing of uncertain patents in a differentiated Stackelberg duopolistic competition market," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 215-229.
    2. Chin-Sheng Chen, 2017. "Endogenous Market Structure and Technology Licensing," The Japanese Economic Review, Japanese Economic Association, vol. 68(1), pages 115-130, March.
    3. She, Chih-Min, 2015. "What determines the technology adoption of firms under optimal tax?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 274-289.
    4. Li, Qing & Zhang, Huaige & Hong, Xianpei, 2020. "Knowledge structure of technology licensing based on co-keywords network: A review and future directions," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 154-165.
    5. Zhao, Dan, 2017. "Choices and impacts of cross-licensing contracts," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 389-405.
    6. Li, Hai & Qing, Qiankai & Wang, Juan & Hong, Xianpei, 2021. "An analysis of technology licensing and parallel importation under different market structures," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 289(1), pages 132-143.
    7. Chin-Sheng Chen, 2017. "Endogenous Market Structure and Technology Licensing," The Japanese Economic Review, Springer, vol. 68(1), pages 115-130, March.
    8. Dongdong Li, 2021. "Optimal licensing strategy of green technology in a mixed oligopoly: Fixed fee versus royalty," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(4), pages 942-951, June.
    9. Madhuri H.Shastry & Uday Bhanu Sinha, 2023. "Privatization and Licensing under Public Budget Constraint," Working papers 343, Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics.
    10. Lu, Yuanzhu & Poddar, Sougata, 2014. "Patent licensing in spatial models," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 250-256.
    11. Hong, Xianpei & Govindan, Kannan & Xu, Lei & Du, Peng, 2017. "Quantity and collection decisions in a closed-loop supply chain with technology licensing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(3), pages 820-829.
    12. Chien-Shu Tsai & Ting-Chung Tsai & Po-Sheng Ko & Chien-Hui Lee & Jen-Yao Lee & Yu-Lin Wang, 2019. "On the Sustainability of Technology Licensing Under Asymmetric Information Game," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-15, December.
    13. Leonard F. S. Wang & Arijit Mukherjee & Chenhang Zeng, 2020. "Does technology licensing matter for privatization?," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 22(5), pages 1462-1480, September.
    14. Liu Yao & Mukherjee Arijit, 2024. "Lobbying for Tariff Protection, International Technology Licensing and Consumer Surplus," The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 24(1), pages 117-139, January.
    15. Haraguchi, Junichi & Matsumura, Toshihiro, 2018. "Government-leading welfare-improving collusion," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 363-370.
    16. Arman Yalvac Aksoy & Catherine Beaudry, 2021. "How are companies paying for university research licenses? Empirical evidence from university-firm technology transfer," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 46(6), pages 2051-2121, December.
    17. Shuai Niu, 2015. "Privatization in the presence of patent licensing," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 116(2), pages 151-163, October.
    18. Chen, Yi-Wen & Yang, Ya-Po & Wang, Leonard F.S. & Wu, Shih-Jye, 2014. "Technology licensing in mixed oligopoly," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 193-204.
    19. Jiaqi Chen & Sang-Ho Lee & Timur K. Muminov, 2021. "Welfare-reducing discriminatory output subsidies with mixed ownership and R&D," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 41(3), pages 1592-1602.
    20. Pu‐yan Nie & Yong‐cong Yang, 2020. "Cost‐reduction innovation under mixed economy," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(7), pages 1195-1201, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abz:journl:y:2017:id:74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Кочетков Дмитрий Михайлович (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://delo.ranepa.ru/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.