Author
Abstract
The purpose of the current study was to form theoretical issues and practical recommendations on development of methodology evaluation for companies implementing modern financial technologies. The research was conducted based on methodology of systematic research, synthesis, abstract logic and scientific forecast, statistical methods and factor analysis methods, expert evaluation, real option method, explored fuzzy logic. Research resulted in discovery of such companies’ features that implement modern financial technology as evaluation objects, as well as exogenous and endogenous factors that impact the evaluation of the researched companies, and these factors’ classification offered; there were methodological recommendations developed on qualitative and quantitative ranking of specific indeterminacy; there were adaptations performed to discounted cash flows, real options, and ratio methods. The methodology developed was approbated based on domestic and foreign companies that provide consulting and evaluations services. As a result of its usage, a more precise evaluation was provided for the companies implementing modern financial technologies. A separate practical usage regarded the adopted method of discounting rate calculation based on the correction for specific fintech implementation risks and the developed mechanism of real options usage for additional company’s value that allows receiving a more accurate evaluation numbers. The classification manual of specific risks developed by the author is used by evaluation practitioners. The scientific issues and practical recommendations on improvement of the companies’ evaluation that were developed within the study are being used for teaching of “Evaluation and business value management†course in Financial University.
Suggested Citation
E. A. Demyanova, 2018.
"Current issues of company evaluation under fintech,"
Strategic decisions and risk management, Real Economy Publishing House, issue 1.
Handle:
RePEc:abw:journl:y:2018:id:757
DOI: 10.17747/2078-8886-2018-1-102-1
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abw:journl:y:2018:id:757. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ООО Ð˜Ð·Ð´Ð°Ñ‚ÐµÐ»ÑŒÑ ÐºÐ¸Ð¹ дом Â«Ð ÐµÐ°Ð»ÑŒÐ½Ð°Ñ Ñ ÐºÐ¾Ð½Ð¾Ð¼Ð¸ÐºÐ°Â» (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.jsdrm.ru/jour/about/journalSponsorship .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.