IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v8y2004i4337.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ALLservice: os conflitos da discussão do orçamento anual

Author

Listed:
  • Fábio Frezatti
  • Reinaldo Guerreiro
  • Tania Casado

Abstract

This Teaching Case focus on the discussion of an I.T. budget process, its development and approval. The case offers the opportunity of dealing with the main concepts related to strategic planning and annual budget. Told from the executive's point of view, it presents the ALLservice history, its growth and dilemmas to survive. It reflects a real situation, but all the data has been changed to avoid identifying the organization. This Teaching Case strategy helps the student to feel the conflicts provided by such events, by looking for conciliation between the theoretical aspects and the behavior variables. The story begins when the ALLservice senior executives had a meeting to analyze and to discuss the 2004 annual budget. As the story tells, some arguments about the scenery differences were shown by the characters to explain the extreme change that took place considering the previous planning; this lead to a non acceptance posture from the president, who demanded a revision and another budget version. The presented dilemma put students into President's place to argue why accept, or not, the budget proposal.

Suggested Citation

  • Fábio Frezatti & Reinaldo Guerreiro & Tania Casado, 2004. "ALLservice: os conflitos da discussão do orçamento anual," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 8(4), pages 183-202.
  • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:8:y:2004:i:4:337
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/337/336
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/download/337/336
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:8:y:2004:i:4:337. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.