IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v7y2003ispe268.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implicações do uso das formulações sobre campo de poder e ação de bourdieu nos estudos organizacionais

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Ceci Misoczky

Abstract

This essay reviews Bourdieu's conceptions, emphasizing the notion of social fields as a result of unequal distribution of different types of capital (types of power), as a field of forces and struggles, according to the relative positions in a relational space. Follows a critical review of the institutional perspective and how the notion of field was incorporated. We believe that Bourdieu's conceptions may offer another look at the issue of social action and change. In this sense, some implications of using Bourdieu's conceptions in organizational studies are explored.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Ceci Misoczky, 2003. "Implicações do uso das formulações sobre campo de poder e ação de bourdieu nos estudos organizacionais," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 7(spe), pages 9-30.
    • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:7:y:2003:i:spe:268
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/268/270
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/download/268/270
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Carolina Lescura de Carvalho Castro Volta & Alex Fernando Borges & Mônica Carvalho Alves Cappelle, 2021. "Succession in Family Business: An Analysis through the Concept of Conatus," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 25(4), pages 200021-2000.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:7:y:2003:i:spe:268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.