IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v3y1999i376.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Percepções de incerteza em um sistema de planejamento e controle: um estudo comparativo Brasil - Inglaterra

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Carolina Pimentel Duarte da Fonseca

Abstract

This study aimed to detect the impact of cultural differences in a planning and control system. In order to reach this objective, a qualitative research was realized in a Brazilian subsidiary of an British multinational corporation. In order to understand more deeply the way the interaction between the national culture and management control practices occured, it was selected a cultural dimension identified by Hofstede (1980) in his study about values of people in over 50 countries. The dimension chosen was uncertainty avoidance, which is defined as the extent to which the members of a culture feel themselves comfortable with uncertainty and ambiguity, aspects strictly related to the planning and control system. The research was based on interviews which sought to investigate the way the informants dealt with uncertainty in their planning and control system. Where the theory suggested more than one possible behaviour, an alternative could be selected. Finally, the reports were able to confirm some results antecipated in the literature while others seemed to be opposite to what was expected, suggesting the influence of other factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Carolina Pimentel Duarte da Fonseca, 1999. "Percepções de incerteza em um sistema de planejamento e controle: um estudo comparativo Brasil - Inglaterra," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 3(3), pages 57-80.
  • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:3:y:1999:i:3:76
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/76/75
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/download/76/75
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:3:y:1999:i:3:76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.