IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v29y2025i11676.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

For an Anti-racist Racialization: Controversies Surrounding Racial Inclusion in Companies

Author

Listed:
  • Pedro Jaime
  • Humberto Reis dos Santos-Souza

Abstract

Objective: with this pensata, we present the concept of racialization as an analytical way to reflect on diversity and racial inclusion in companies and thus advance the anti-racist agenda. This concept allows us to defend affirmative action as a legitimate strategy to correct racial inequalities in the corporate world. Provocations: given the controversies and accusations of reverse racism generated by Magazine Luiza’s exclusive trainee program for black people, we pose the following provocations: (a) is the Magalu’s trainee program a racist initiative? (b) is this an expression of reverse racism? Conclusions: we argue the following position: racial inclusion programs created by Magalu or other companies cannot be labeled as racist. This position is based on the concept of racialization. We mobilize this notion to claim that, if all racism refers to racialization, not all racialization can be considered racist simply because it makes use of the racial lexicon. This argument takes on the challenge of facing the paradox of an anti-racism that is structured on the logic of racialization.

Suggested Citation

  • Pedro Jaime & Humberto Reis dos Santos-Souza, 2025. "For an Anti-racist Racialization: Controversies Surrounding Racial Inclusion in Companies," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 29(Vol. 29 N), pages 240032-2400.
  • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:29:y:2025:i:1:1676
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1676
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1676/2094
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:29:y:2025:i:1:1676. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.