IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v26y2022i21505.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impossibility of Open Science without Otherness and Epistemic Plurality

Author

Listed:
  • Marcelo de Souza Bispo

Abstract

My objective in this text is to present a counterpoint to the positivist bias that has dominated the debate on open science and eventually highlight some problems and provide a more plural and inclusive perspective on the subject. I reflect on three key points that have pervaded the debate on open science, namely: (a) open access to the knowledge produced, (b) transparency in research processes, and (c) replication and reproducibility of previous research. My focus is on highlighting the need for a plural and inclusive view of science, one which is grounded on otherness assumptions.

Suggested Citation

  • Marcelo de Souza Bispo, 2022. "The Impossibility of Open Science without Otherness and Epistemic Plurality," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 26(2), pages 210246-2102.
    • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:26:y:2022:i:2:1505
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1505
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1505/1721
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:26:y:2022:i:2:1505. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.