IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v22y2018i31281.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Civil Service Competition for Professors at a Federal University: Proposal for Software Improvements

Author

Listed:
  • Matheus Boni Barbosa
  • Elvis Silveira-Martins

Abstract

This research proposes an intervention plan for solving difficulties and offering improvements related to the Civil Service testing and selection process for professors at a Brazilian Federal University. The proposals were motivated, mainly, due to a series of occasional misunderstandings found in documentary records, resulting from the interaction between the software used to manage tasks in the selection process and the users of this system, leading to the necessity of producing specific documents to methodize the processes. Although not resulting in harm from a finalistic point of view, these actions increase the time spent and the number of activities before homologation of the results. There was, therefore, an intention to more acutely understand the problems, so the diagnosis focuses on those factors that had a greater impact on the process. The methodology adopted involved bibliographic research, document analysis and a participating observer in the processes. The result was an intervention proposal to act on the software’s current functions, to create new functions and to promote integration of the software into the institutional portfolio, allowing effective action in the correction and prevention of problems and also improvements in the processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Matheus Boni Barbosa & Elvis Silveira-Martins, 2018. "Civil Service Competition for Professors at a Federal University: Proposal for Software Improvements," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 22(3), pages 443-465.
  • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:22:y:2018:i:3:1281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1281/1276
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/download/1281/1276
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:22:y:2018:i:3:1281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.