IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v21y2017i11204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Analysis of Academics and their Scientific Publications in the Field of Management

Author

Listed:
  • Takeyoshi Imasato
  • Marcelo Scherer Perlin
  • Denis Borenstein

Abstract

Scientific production has been the focus of many discussions, particularly regarding the issue of scientific productivity. This study analyzes the profile and publications of academics (PhDs) working in the field of management in Brazil and their respective scientific publications, in order to identify the factors that explain this particular aspect of scientific productivity. Using descriptive statistics and statistical models based on data about 1976 researchers registered on the Brazilian Lattes database which compiles Brazilian academic researchers' curriculum vitaes, the study identified factors related to academic education and experience that have an impact on academics' scientific productivity in Management. Research results also indicate that important changes in the patterns of academic education and productivity are taking place in Brazil. Considering the centrality of scientific productivity, the paper suggests new studies to increase discourse regarding the future path of intellectual production and graduate management programs in Brazil.

Suggested Citation

  • Takeyoshi Imasato & Marcelo Scherer Perlin & Denis Borenstein, 2017. "An Analysis of Academics and their Scientific Publications in the Field of Management," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 21(1), pages 62-83.
    • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:21:y:2017:i:1:1204
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1204/1200
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/download/1204/1200
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:21:y:2017:i:1:1204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.