IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/abg/anprac/v19y2015ispe31152.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Different Individual-Organization Attachments: Exploring Their Meanings between Managers

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Paula Moreno Pinho
  • Antonio Virgilio Bittencourt Bastos
  • Diva Ester Okazaki Rowe

Abstract

This work investigated Organizational Commitment based on the three component model - affective, normative and continuance - introduced by Meyer and Allen (1991) and two constructs - Organizational Entrenchment and Consent. The objective was analysis of the meaning attributed by managers to three links, exploring their distinct elements. The research was carried out through the use of qualitative analysis of interviews with 20 managers. The interview script investigated personal data and the concepts attributed to each link. Data was submitted to content analysis. Results highlighted that managers have very different conceptual structures for the three constructs. Commitment was considered a positive tie, indicating engagement and motivation. In a different way, entrenchment was related to fear of changing organizations, in that changing jobs risks existing stability. Entrenchment turned out to be an instrumental tie that imprisons the subject and leads to development of a relationship of dependency and accommodation. Consent fit better into the idea of submission to power and authority relationships, and being unsatisfied with work and the organization. In conclusion, the three links are different in conceptual terms and indicate distinctive influence on relationships between individuals and organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Paula Moreno Pinho & Antonio Virgilio Bittencourt Bastos & Diva Ester Okazaki Rowe, 2015. "Different Individual-Organization Attachments: Exploring Their Meanings between Managers," RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 19(spe3), pages 288-304.
  • Handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:19:y:2015:i:spe3:1152
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/view/1152/1148
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://rac.anpad.org.br/index.php/rac/article/download/1152/1148
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:19:y:2015:i:spe3:1152. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.