Author
Listed:
- Danielle Mantovani
- Mariana Monfort Barboza
- Juan José Camou Viacava
- Paulo Henrique Muller Prado
Abstract
The regulatory focus theory suggests that consumers rely on their motivational focus (prevention vs. promotion) for their evaluations and decisions. Usually consumers prefer products that match their personal motivational focus. Previous studies show that this pattern preferably occurs when we are not motivated to process information. However, this study suggests that situations that require greater cognitive effort, in which the consumer needs more information to decide because of the difficulty of the task, messages that have an opposing motivational regulatory focus will be more persuasive. When consumers have not been previously exposed to difficult tasks which require more cognitive effort, their willingness to buy products presented in ways that match their regulatory fit will increase. Experiment 1 (n=257) showed evidence that task difficulty has a moderating role in ad-message persuasiveness. Experiment 2 (n=144) presents the same moderating effect of task difficulty on the regulatory fit (vs unfit) phenomenon for willingness to buy. Therefore, not all information compatible with consumer motivational focus is well evaluated. When greater cognitive effort is required, unfit messages may be more persuasive.
Suggested Citation
Danielle Mantovani & Mariana Monfort Barboza & Juan José Camou Viacava & Paulo Henrique Muller Prado, 2015.
"When Do Opposing Forces Increase Willingness to Buy? Regulatory Motivational Focus and Ad Messages,"
RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 19(spe2), pages 178-196.
Handle:
RePEc:abg:anprac:v:19:y:2015:i:spe2:1146
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:19:y:2015:i:spe2:1146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.