Author
Listed:
- Jamille Barbosa Cavalcanti Pereira
- Darcy Mitiko Mori Hanashiro
Abstract
The relevance of diversity practices has been growing in Brazilian organizations. Nevertheless, the theoretical field in Brazil has not followed this practical development. The current literature expresses the prevalence in the identification and discussion of these practices, based on the belief that diversity always brings about positive results for the organization. However, this utilitarian approach neglects intrinsic subjectivity inherent to different social actors: someone who belongs to an identity group which is not considered dominant in the organizational setting (minority) and those who are traditionally considered the dominant group (majority). This essay aims to discuss the attitudes of these two groups towards diversity practices, proposing a theoretical model made up of four theoretical dimensions: acceptance attitudes based on social justice, acceptance attitudes based on obtaining gains, rejection attitudes based on beliefs in reverse discrimination, and rejection attitudes due to concerns about stigma. The understanding of these attitudes can contribute to the development of new approaches in diversity studies, in addition to brining a vision that an effective diversity practice in organizations means understanding the vision of the different stakeholders involved in them.
Suggested Citation
Jamille Barbosa Cavalcanti Pereira & Darcy Mitiko Mori Hanashiro, 2010.
"To be or not to be favorable towards diversity practices? this is the question,"
RAC - Revista de Administração Contemporânea (Journal of Contemporary Administration), ANPAD - Associação Nacional de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa em Administração, vol. 14(4), pages 670-683.
Handle:
RePEc:abg:anprac:v:14:y:2010:i:4:771
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:abg:anprac:v:14:y:2010:i:4:771. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Information Technology of ANPAD (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://anpad.org.br .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.